| Author |
Message |
Comm
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:20 am
Post subject: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
SAMPLE ONE
Message-ID: <4240F10D.6127@worldnet.att.net>
From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net>
Newsgroups: sci.lang,sci.anthropology
Subject: Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:31:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.76.6.202
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1111552267 12.76.6.202 (Wed, 23
Mar 2005 04:31:07 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:31:07 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: news.earthlink.net sci.lang:299937 sci.anthropology:128718
X-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:31:08 PST
(newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net)
Commie, you ignorant slut, I know nothing of you besides your ignorant
appearances at sci.lang, and that is far, far too much of you to know.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
Sample TWO.
Message-ID: <4240F16D.43B7@worldnet.att.net>
From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net>
Newsgroups: sci.lang,sci.anthropology
Subject: Re: Language tree (Re: Related languages)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:32:43 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.76.6.202
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
Mar 2005 04:32:43 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:32:43 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
That's twice, you ignorant slut. It's not "was heisst du," it's "wie
heisst du."
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
SAMPLE THREE:
Message-ID: <4240F0AF.7791@worldnet.att.net>
From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net>
Newsgroups: sci.lang,sci.anthropology
Subject: Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:29:34 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.76.6.202
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1111552174 12.76.6.202 (Wed, 23
Mar 2005 04:29:34 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:29:34 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: news.earthlink.net sci.lang:299936 sci.anthropology:128717
X-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:29:35 PST
(newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net)
Commie, you ignorant slut, "Hispanic" means 'Spanish-speaking'.
Portuguese is not Spanish. Neither is Catalan, Basque, or even Galician
(someone else's unlikely suggestion for what you couldn't think of --
probably you've never heard of it).
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
++++++++++++++++
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel, fyi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thor Lancelot Simon
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
|
"Comm", you ignorant slut, I suggest you Google "Jane, you ignorant slut"
and see what you find.
Ooooh. Poor baby. You've been (according to you) "libelled" on the
Internet. Gosh. We feel so bad for you -- someone said something
about you that you didn't like (and made a pop-cultural reference
that you were too dumb to pick up on, even worse)!
Let us know when you recover those millions of dollars from Peter that,
according to you, ought to be your just reward.
--
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to be
abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." - Noam Chomsky |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Matthew Fields
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:51 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...] |
| Quote: | THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel, fyi.
|
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stephen Sprunk
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:52 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
"Comm" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
| Quote: | Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the
abusive term "slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke.
There was clear hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
....
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel, fyi.
|
This allegedly occurred in sci.lang and sci.anthropology. Please keep your
complaints out of nyc.transit and other unrelated groups.
S |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Comm
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:10 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
"Geoff" <grw888@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8AJ2e.8028$H06.6356@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| Quote: | Comm wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
SAMPLE ONE
Message-ID: <4240F10D.6127@worldnet.att.net
From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net
Newsgroups: sci.lang,sci.anthropology
Subject: Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:31:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.76.6.202
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1111552267 12.76.6.202 (Wed,
23
Mar 2005 04:31:07 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:31:07 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: news.earthlink.net sci.lang:299937 sci.anthropology:128718
X-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:31:08 PST
(newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net)
Commie, you ignorant slut, I know nothing of you besides your ignorant
appearances at sci.lang, and that is far, far too much of you to know.
Lighten up. Peter was parodying a "Saturday Night Live" parody of a famous
"60 Minutes" segment from the late 1970s called Point - Counterpoint.
Shana Alexander (Liberal) and Jack Kilpatrick (Conservative) would briefly
debate some issue of the day. In the SNL parody, Dan Aykroyd and Jane
Curtin played them. When things got hot in the exchange of words,
Aykroyd/Kilpatrick would yell, "Jane, you ignorant slut!" to shut off the
discussion.
Part of American comedy history. Not libel.
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/60_Minutes
|
I never watched that show. I know he's just being a BITCH. But look at the
size of the thread thus far - and it's only the first day. ROTFLMAO. Damn,
that was easy. Like white on snow, they jumped at the opportunity to bitch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Comm
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:10 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
"Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:aWJ2e.160$r6.35@news.itd.umich.edu...
| Quote: | In article <QtJ2e.11892$S46.3111@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
"Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:mQH2e.147$r6.7@news.itd.umich.edu...
In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was
clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...]
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel,
fyi.
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
Do you deny that your mother was a crack whore that had an abortion when
you
were 1 month in her womb?
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such
thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
We notice that you ran away from my question, you ignorant slut.
|
We? Do you have MPD or something? I noticed you JUMPED on the opportunity
to bitch on obvious trolling he he he he he. Of course I'm not an ignorant
slut; I'm not your mother! Elementary, in't? For this series of posts I'm
a TROLL, you animated abortion. And you LOVE trolls - right?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raymond S. Wise
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:11 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
| Quote: | Raymond S. Wise wrote:
[Various Usenet newsgroups dropped]
Comm wrote:
"Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:mQH2e.147$r6.7@news.itd.umich.edu...
In article
7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the
abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There
was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...]
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for
libel, fyi.
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
Do you deny that your mother was a crack whore that had an
abortion when you
were 1 month in her womb?
By the time you wrote the above, you could have googled "Jane, you
ignorant slut" as suggested by Thor Lancelot Simon and have come to
realize the nature of the joke that Peter T. Daniels made and the
nature of the variation on that joke that Matthew Fields made. In
light
of that, your response was silly.
You're seeing replies that I haven't -- Matt is in r.m.c., which
wasn't
even in the list on the message when I first saw it in nyc.transit
(Is
he in r.m.o.?).
|
I don't know where Matthew Fields usually hangs out, but I'm reading
this thread on Google Groups and the message of his to which I referred
showed itself to be posted to the following newsgroups:
sci.anthropology, sci.lang, rec.music.classical,
rec.arts.movies.past-films, alt.usage.english, rec.music.opera,
nyc.transit
--
Raymond S. Wise
Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tedd Jacobs
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:12 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
"Peter T. Daniels" wrote...
| Quote: | Hi all! Even the folks at the newsgroups I don't read.
The "offending" phrase was "Comm, you ignorant slut," which ought to be
familiar to any American over the age of 40 or so.
|
especially when it is true. of course if she had the capacity to be
eduacated she could at least do something about the 'ignorant' part. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Peter T. Daniels
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:12 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Raymond S. Wise wrote:
| Quote: |
[Various Usenet newsgroups dropped]
Comm wrote:
"Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:mQH2e.147$r6.7@news.itd.umich.edu...
In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...]
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel, fyi.
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
Do you deny that your mother was a crack whore that had an abortion when you
were 1 month in her womb?
By the time you wrote the above, you could have googled "Jane, you
ignorant slut" as suggested by Thor Lancelot Simon and have come to
realize the nature of the joke that Peter T. Daniels made and the
nature of the variation on that joke that Matthew Fields made. In light
of that, your response was silly.
|
You're seeing replies that I haven't -- Matt is in r.m.c., which wasn't
even in the list on the message when I first saw it in nyc.transit (Is
he in r.m.o.?).
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Geoff
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:12 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Comm wrote:
| Quote: | Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
SAMPLE ONE
Message-ID: <4240F10D.6127@worldnet.att.net
From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net
Newsgroups: sci.lang,sci.anthropology
Subject: Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:31:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.76.6.202
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1111552267 12.76.6.202 (Wed, 23
Mar 2005 04:31:07 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:31:07 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: news.earthlink.net sci.lang:299937 sci.anthropology:128718
X-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:31:08 PST
(newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net)
Commie, you ignorant slut, I know nothing of you besides your ignorant
appearances at sci.lang, and that is far, far too much of you to know.
|
Lighten up. Peter was parodying a "Saturday Night Live" parody of a
famous "60 Minutes" segment from the late 1970s called Point -
Counterpoint. Shana Alexander (Liberal) and Jack Kilpatrick
(Conservative) would briefly debate some issue of the day. In the SNL
parody, Dan Aykroyd and Jane Curtin played them. When things got hot in
the exchange of words, Aykroyd/Kilpatrick would yell, "Jane, you
ignorant slut!" to shut off the discussion.
Part of American comedy history. Not libel.
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/60_Minutes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Matthew Fields
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:12 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
In article <QtJ2e.11892$S46.3111@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:mQH2e.147$r6.7@news.itd.umich.edu...
In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...]
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel, fyi.
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
Do you deny that your mother was a crack whore that had an abortion when you
were 1 month in her womb?
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such
thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
|
We notice that you ran away from my question, you ignorant slut.
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Josh Hill
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:12 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:02:57 -0800, "Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus
of recirculation')"
<stderr@abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | He's obviously trolling, which usually includes bringing into a
crosspost groups of extremely different characteristics. If you
complain, it will just encourage your group to be the target. BTW, what
do you talking about in nyc.transit, fair increases because those
bastard kids keep up their damned turnstile hopping?
|
Finnegans Wake.
--
Josh |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Steven Bornfeld
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:13 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Matthew Fields wrote:
| Quote: | In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...]
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel, fyi.
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
|
Maybe a legal question, but can a matter of opinion be libel? And can
it be libel if the target is anonymous?
Cheeeburrrgerrr cheeeburrrrgerrrr cheeburrgerrr
Steve
--
Cut the nonsense to reply |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raymond S. Wise
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:13 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
[Various Usenet newsgroups dropped]
Comm wrote:
| Quote: | "Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:mQH2e.147$r6.7@news.itd.umich.edu...
In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive
term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was
clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...]
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for
libel, fyi.
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
Do you deny that your mother was a crack whore that had an abortion
when you
were 1 month in her womb?
|
By the time you wrote the above, you could have googled "Jane, you
ignorant slut" as suggested by Thor Lancelot Simon and have come to
realize the nature of the joke that Peter T. Daniels made and the
nature of the variation on that joke that Matthew Fields made. In light
of that, your response was silly.
--
Raymond S. Wise
Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanq
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:13 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Jacques Guy wrote:
| Quote: | Comm wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
|
If that's the worst anyone ever calls you on a newsgroup,
count yourself fortunate! You and the Luhan broad sound as
though you'd make a good pair. ("Libel" - Sheesh!)
| Quote: |
I can recommend a fine law firm in Zurich... help, Mr Google...
Eberle Kämpfen Bösiger Theiler (www.ekbt-law.ch) in
Zurich, their offices are Rue de la Justice (but
it's in German, not French, something like Richtigkeit
Gasse) Ah, got it!
Gerechtigkeitsgasse 23
8002 Zürich
Telefon 01 202 97 85
Telefax 01 202 75 05
Say I sent you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in