Question
Vocaboly.com Forum Index Vocaboly.com
Vocabulary builder software for SAT, TOEFL, GRE, GMAT and more
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web www.vocaboly.com
Question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vocaboly.com Forum Index -> alt.english.usage
Author Message
mrf
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:53 pm    Post subject: Question Reply with quote

Which of the following, if any, are correct...

1) In concert with their owners, we assist dogs in overcoming...

2) In concert with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming...
3) In concert with their friends, we assist people in overcoming...

Back to top
Steven Xu
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:28 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

All of the phrases are logically sound. When you say 'their friends,'
you often refer to the friends of the object. To me, 3 sounds correct.
It would help if you completed the sentence, though.
Back to top
mrf
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 1:04 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

Thank you for your reply.

For dogs (#1), perhaps... overcoming their panic at the sound of
thunder.

For people (#3), perhaps... overcoming the isolation that confinement
to their wheel chair often brings.

Back to top
Steven Xu
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 1:37 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

Alright. That all makes sense. Could you please elborate on what
exactly you would like to have verified? Logic, punctuation, etc?
Back to top
Michael Mendelsohn
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 1:40 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

mrf schrieb:
Quote:
Which of the following, if any, are correct...
2) In concert with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming...

Example:
Some people complain that their dogs behave overly territorial towards
other people. This can be nuisance when having friends over for a visit,
because it usually means that the dog must be locked away. Of course,
many dog owners aren't happy with this. In concert with their friends,
we assist dogs in overcoming that territorial behaviour and help them to
learn to accept visitors.

Cheers
Michael
--
Still an attentive ear he lent Her speech hath caused this pain
But could not fathom what she meant Easier I count it to explain
She was not deep, nor eloquent. The jargon of the howling main
-- from Lewis Carroll: The Three Usenet Trolls
Back to top
Peter Seibel
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:22 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

Michael Mendelsohn <invalid@msgid.michael.mendelsohn.de> writes:

Quote:
mrf schrieb:
Which of the following, if any, are correct...
2) In concert with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming...

Example:

Some people complain that their dogs behave overly territorial
towards other people. This can be nuisance when having friends over
for a visit, because it usually means that the dog must be locked
away. Of course, many dog owners aren't happy with this. In concert
with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming that territorial
behaviour and help them to learn to accept visitors.

Hmmm. That's sort of a mess. Focusing on the last sentence, since
that's the one you asked about originally, to whom does "we" refer?
And do you mean the owner's friends or the dog's friends? I'd change
that last sentence to something like (guessing at the intended
meaning):

We work with dog owners and their friends to help dogs learn to
accept visitors.

or:

We teach dog owners how, working with a few friendly visitors, they
can help their dogs overcome their territorial instincts and learn to
accept visitors calmly.

or even:

However, dog owners, with the help of their friends, can train their
dogs to be less territorial and to accept visitors calmly.

-Peter

--
Peter Seibel peter@javamonkey.com

Lisp is the red pill. -- John Fraser, comp.lang.lisp
Back to top
mrf
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:25 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

"...what exactly you would like to have verified"

Are the sentence (fragments) gramatically correct?

That is, at least one person thinks the initial "their" must refer to
the subject, making the elided...

What we do:

4) In concert with their owners, assist dogs in overcoming...
5) In concert with their friends, assist dogs in overcoming...
6) In concert with their friends, assist people in overcoming...

incorrect.

I am looking at what others think about this question, which is raised
by some proposed language in (3/6), and I decided to look at related
usage in fragments like (1/4) and (2/5) because I suspect the
conversation might benefit from having such examples.
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:34 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

First sentence: It should be "territorially" (the adverb)
Second sentence: It should be "a nuisance when they have friends" (the
article "a" is needed)
Third sentence: It should be "we teach dog owners how to help their
dogs overcome that" (the introductory phrase must modify the subject of
the sentence)

Bonnie Granat
http://www.GranatEdit.com
Back to top
mrf
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:41 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

Recap...
1) In concert with their owners, we assist dogs in overcoming...
2) In concert with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming...
3) In concert with their friends, we assist people in overcoming...

elided to...
4) In concert with their owners, assist dogs in overcoming...
5) In concert with their friends, assist dogs in overcoming...
6) In concert with their friends, assist people in overcoming...

"...In concert with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming that
territorial behaviour and help them to
learn to accept visitors ...michael".

In (2), the phrase "their friends" is the type of language that some
might think refers to "dog friends", of the canine variety, others
might think refers to a dog's "people-friends" and still others,
believing dogs don't have friends, might think refers to the stated (2)
or implied (5) WE ,except that it should be OUR not THEIR.

This might invite a confusion (see michael in the above) for (2/5), but
I find it unlikely to occur for anyone in (1/4).

The practical question I need to resolve is ... are 3/6 gramatically
correct?
Back to top
Michael Mendelsohn
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 4:08 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

mrf schrieb:
Quote:
Recap...
1) In concert with their owners, we assist dogs in overcoming...
2) In concert with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming...
3) In concert with their friends, we assist people in overcoming...

"...In concert with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming that
territorial behaviour and help them to
learn to accept visitors ...michael".

In (2), the phrase "their friends" is the type of language that some
might think refers to "dog friends", of the canine variety, others
might think refers to a dog's "people-friends" and still others,
believing dogs don't have friends, might think refers to the stated (2)
or implied (5) WE ,except that it should be OUR not THEIR.

I thought that "their" could refer to persons mentioned in the previous
sentence, hence my example. It couldn't refer to "we" because you
haven't written "our friends". I agree that "their" could refer to the
dogs' friends.

Cheers
Michael
--
Still an attentive ear he lent Her speech hath caused this pain
But could not fathom what she meant Easier I count it to explain
She was not deep, nor eloquent. The jargon of the howling main
-- from Lewis Carroll: The Three Usenet Trolls
Back to top
Michael Mendelsohn
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 4:12 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

bgranat@granatedit.com schrieb:
Quote:
First sentence: It should be "territorially" (the adverb)

You're right. I can't determine for myself whether "behave" is similar
to "seem" or "sound" (which take the adjective), because with "behave"
the "territorially" can be seen as more of a description of the animal
than of its behaviour.

Quote:
Second sentence: It should be "a nuisance when they have friends" (the
article "a" is needed)

This is a typo. I'm sorry.

Quote:
Third sentence: It should be "we teach dog owners how to help their
dogs overcome that" (the introductory phrase must modify the subject of
the sentence)

I do not understand this point. Could you elaborate, please?

Cheers
Michael
--
Still an attentive ear he lent Her speech hath caused this pain
But could not fathom what she meant Easier I count it to explain
She was not deep, nor eloquent. The jargon of the howling main
-- from Lewis Carroll: The Three Usenet Trolls
Back to top
CDB
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 3:00 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

"mrf" <mrf@cpes.com> wrote in message
news:1104352886.427118.130070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Recap...
1) In concert with their owners, we assist dogs in overcoming...
2) In concert with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming...
3) In concert with their friends, we assist people in overcoming...

elided to...
4) In concert with their owners, assist dogs in overcoming...
5) In concert with their friends, assist dogs in overcoming...
6) In concert with their friends, assist people in overcoming...

"...In concert with their friends, we assist dogs in overcoming that
territorial behaviour and help them to
learn to accept visitors ...michael".

In (2), the phrase "their friends" is the type of language that some
might think refers to "dog friends", of the canine variety, others
might think refers to a dog's "people-friends" and still others,
believing dogs don't have friends, might think refers to the stated (2)
or implied (5) WE ,except that it should be OUR not THEIR.

This might invite a confusion (see michael in the above) for (2/5), but
I find it unlikely to occur for anyone in (1/4).

The practical question I need to resolve is ... are 3/6 gramatically
correct?

Sentence fragment #3 is *grammatically* correct, as far as it goes.
Fragment #6 is also, if you take "assist" to be an imperative form;
alternatively, it could be an item in a list, all following on a remotely
expressed common subject, or phrase containing one, like "We can:" or "We
can do the following:".

My dog has a number of friends: several humans and several other dogs that
he likes to meet and socialize with, although he has never had a
pack-relationship with them. CDB, his dog's second-best friend
Back to top
mrf
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 6:15 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

Thanks for your reply, CDB. I would like to pursue this a bit.

Quote:
Sentence fragment #3 is *grammatically* correct, as far as it goes.
Fragment #6 <<<<<<<is also, if you take "assist" to be an imperative
form;
alternatively, it could be an item in a list>>>>>>, all following on
a remotely
expressed common subject, or phrase containing one, like "We can:" or
"We
can do the following:".

Not being the imperitive case you labeled as OK, are you of the opinion
fragment 6 would NOT be gramatically correct if, for example, it were
an item in a list that was of the form...

We can do the following:

- Help people deal with paperwork in relation to governmental agencies

- In concert with their friends, assist people in overcoming social
phobias

- Facilitate people meeting and adopting dogs

- along with their vets, assist those dogs in licking noses more
sedately
....

woof... mrf (friend to Jasmine, Dart, Israel, Bear and Padric).
Back to top
CDB
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 8:00 am    Post subject: Re: Question Reply with quote

"mrf" <mrf@cpes.com> wrote in message
news:1104448501.107198.26680@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Thanks for your reply, CDB. I would like to pursue this a bit.

Sentence fragment #3 is *grammatically* correct, as far as it goes.
Fragment #6 <<<<<<<is also, if you take "assist" to be an imperative
form;
alternatively, it could be an item in a list>>>>>>, all following on
a remotely
expressed common subject, or phrase containing one, like "We can:" or
"We
can do the following:".

Not being the imperitive case you labeled as OK, are you of the opinion
fragment 6 would NOT be gramatically correct if, for example, it were
an item in a list that was of the form...

We can do the following:

- Help people deal with paperwork in relation to governmental agencies

- In concert with their friends, assist people in overcoming social
phobias

- Facilitate people meeting and adopting dogs

- along with their vets, assist those dogs in licking noses more
sedately
...

woof... mrf (friend to Jasmine, Dart, Israel, Bear and Padric).

That would be the old list-with-a-common-subject trick. Looks grammatically
OK to us.
Napoleon and his faithful monkey companion, CDB
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vocaboly.com Forum Index -> alt.english.usage All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Office Forum Access Forum Electronics Windows Server Exchange Server
New Topics Powered by phpBB