Proof of anticipation in ducks
Vocaboly.com Forum Index Vocaboly.com
Vocabulary builder software for SAT, TOEFL, GRE, GMAT and more
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web www.vocaboly.com
Proof of anticipation in ducks
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vocaboly.com Forum Index -> alt.english.usage
Author Message
Peter Moylan
Guest





Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:42 am    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

banmilk@hotmail.com turpitued:
Quote:


dh@. wrote:
Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Years ago the squirrels at Stanley Park in Vancouver B.C. would run
over to people in anticipation of being fed.

They would chatter a mean streak at you if you had no peanuts to give
them.

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food. Apparently he likes
fish and chips better than worms.

--
Peter Moylan peter at ee dot newcastle dot edu dot au
http://eepjm.newcastle.edu.au (OS/2 and eCS information and software)

Back to top
meirman
Guest





Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

In alt.english.usage on Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (UTC)
peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan) posted:

Quote:
banmilk@hotmail.com turpitued:


dh@. wrote:
Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Years ago the squirrels at Stanley Park in Vancouver B.C. would run
over to people in anticipation of being fed.

They would chatter a mean streak at you if you had no peanuts to give
them.

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food. Apparently he likes
fish and chips better than worms.

Where can you get fish and worms?

s/ meirman
Posting from alt.english.usage
--
For gosh sakes, when you ask a question, say what sort of English you are asking about.
When you give an answer, say in what part of the world you think your answer is valid.

If you are emailing me please
say if you are posting the same response.

Town NW of Pittsburgh Pa. 0 to 10 years | Brooklyn 12 years
Indianapolis 7 years | Now in
Chicago 6 years | Baltimore 22 years
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:57:29 -0500, Michael Nitabach <mnitabach@acedsl.com> wrote:

Quote:
dh@. wrote in news:0mg7e1dd13ldh8te7k1hnlfqd9if28mobn@4ax.com:

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:44:29 -0500, Michael Nitabach
mnitabach@acedsl.com> wrote:

dh@. wrote in news:rsa5e1p5nfflgi1s65thrmoqhacl1a5qbj@4ax.com:

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:13:47 -0500, Michael Nitabach
mnitabach@acedsl.com> wrote:

dh@. wrote in news:jau4e1ll031tp3hdj7ql8cf7cvk2nkb9oh@4ax.com:

Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Goldfish do the same thing. Why do you consider this worth
remarking?

Only because an idiot called Goo insists that no animals are
able to experience anticipation or disappointment.

Are you surprised that organisms anticipate regularities in
their environments?

I'm not. To most people it's easy to understand and makes
perfect sense, but Goo doesn't understand it, doesn't believe
it, and of course can make no sense at all out of it.

Even single cell cyanobacteria anticipate day-to-night
and night-to-day transitions.

Hmmm...light-to-dark etc transitions perhaps, but they could
have no real concept of night and day imo.

What's a concept?
_________________________________________________________
Main Entry: con·cept
Pronunciation: 'kän-"sept
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin conceptum, neuter of conceptus, past participle
of concipere to conceive -- more at CONCEIVE
1 : something conceived in the mind : THOUGHT, NOTION
[...]
synonym see IDEA

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=concept&x=
0&y=0 ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
Any of the above work for me. Since they don't have a brain,
they can have
no thought, notion, idea, or anything else regarding night and
day. That may not prevent them from being able to anticipate and
respond to things, including light and darkness, but it does
prevent the ability to give any consideration to day and night,
imo.


Do you think that possession of a brain guarantees that the possessor
has a "real concept" of its perceptions and actions?

LOL. Good one. I like to point out that grass isn't really green
sometimes, because it's a great example of that, and I haven't
known anyone else to point it out. Green is what things that
appear to be green "are" not, since they reflect away green
light. But my guess is that a brain is necessary in order to have
any real concepts of anything. Maybe not though.
When I responded at first I was incorrectly interpreting
your question as being about an "accurate" concept btw, but
I left it anyway. Now I'm wondering what you mean by "real
concept"...

Back to top
Guest






Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (UTC), peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan) wrote:

Quote:
banmilk@hotmail.com turpitued:


dh@. wrote:
Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Years ago the squirrels at Stanley Park in Vancouver B.C. would run
over to people in anticipation of being fed.

They would chatter a mean streak at you if you had no peanuts to give
them.

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food.

He sure wouldn't do that if he didn't anticipate something to eat.
He has probably even learned to recognise some people who help
him out a lot....probably mostly girls imo.
Back to top
Peter Moylan
Guest





Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:54 am    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

meirman turpitued:
Quote:
In alt.english.usage on Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (UTC)
peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan) posted:

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food. Apparently he likes
fish and chips better than worms.

Where can you get fish and worms?

In a fisherman's bag.

--
Peter Moylan peter at ee dot newcastle dot edu dot au
http://eepjm.newcastle.edu.au (OS/2 and eCS information and software)
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 7:01 am    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

dh@. wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (UTC), peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan) wrote:

banmilk@hotmail.com turpitued:


dh@. wrote:
Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Years ago the squirrels at Stanley Park in Vancouver B.C. would run
over to people in anticipation of being fed.

They would chatter a mean streak at you if you had no peanuts to give
them.

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food.

He sure wouldn't do that if he didn't anticipate something to eat.
He has probably even learned to recognise some people who help
him out a lot....probably mostly girls imo.



The anecdotal evidence presented on this thread proves two points:

a. Animals are able to anticipate.

b. Goobernicus is stupid beyond belief.
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:14 am    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:43:48 GMT, Goobernicus cried:

Quote:
banmilk@hotmail.com wrote:


dh@. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (UTC), peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan) wrote:


banmilk@hotmail.com turpitued:


dh@. wrote:

Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Years ago the squirrels at Stanley Park in Vancouver B.C. would run
over to people in anticipation of being fed.

They would chatter a mean streak at you if you had no peanuts to give
them.

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food.

He sure wouldn't do that if he didn't anticipate something to eat.
He has probably even learned to recognise some people who help
him out a lot....probably mostly girls imo.




The anecdotal evidence presented on this thread proves two points:

It doesn't.

As banmilk said, it proves at least two Goo...

Quote:
a. Animals are able to anticipate.

Wrong.

No, at least some are. The magpie learned that some people would
feed it, so it approaches people due to the *anticipation* it feels toward
the possibility of getting food from them. Before anything will pursue a
possible opportunity, it must be able to anticipate the hoped for objective.
When it gets it, the positive reinforcement makes its anticipation grow
even stronger.

Now Gooder, here is where you have completely and consistently
failed, and here is where you will fail once again:

If it's not anticipation which causes the bird to give the very clear
impression that it's experiencing anticipation, in this situation which
could very easily cause anticipation--and which most likely would not
even exist if the bird were not experiencing anticipation--then what do
you "think" is causing the bird to act like it's anticipating? Goo???

Quote:
b. Goobernicus is stupid beyond belief.

There is no one named "goobernicus".

That's you: the moron who thinks he's a genius. A simple
Google search confirms it, and maybe it will for years. It would be
cool if in ten years you are still the number one result in a Google
search for Goobernicus, because you are the number one Goober.

Maybe if you can answer the question you can prove your genius.
But when instead you fail miserably as you will and always do, you
will once more reconfirm that you have no clue what you're trying
to discuss, much less are you able to explain it. You indeed deserve
the title of Goobernicus.
Back to top
Rudy Canoza
Guest





Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:01 am    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

Goo Fuckwit wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:43:48 GMT, Rudy wrote:

Ron Prickcheese Hamilton wrote:


Goo Fuckwit wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (UTC), peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan) wrote:


banmilk@hotmail.com turpitued:


dh@. wrote:

Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Years ago the squirrels at Stanley Park in Vancouver B.C. would run
over to people in anticipation of being fed.

They would chatter a mean streak at you if you had no peanuts to give
them.

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food.

He sure wouldn't do that if he didn't anticipate something to eat.
He has probably even learned to recognise some people who help
him out a lot....probably mostly girls imo.




The anecdotal evidence presented on this thread proves two points:

It doesn't.

As banmilk said,

Ron Prickcheese Hamilton farted. He didn't say anything.


Quote:
a. Animals are able to anticipate.

Wrong.

No,

Yes. It's wrong.


Quote:
If it's not anticipation which causes the bird to give the very clear
impression that it's experiencing anticipation

The bird does NOT give any such impression, Goo Fuckwit. You, because
of your emotional disorder, think you're seeing anticipation in the
bird. You aren't - you're merely projecting your desires.



Quote:
b. Goobernicus is stupid beyond belief.

There is no one named "goobernicus".

That's

There is no one named "goobernicus". But there *is* a Fuckwit:
Fuckwit David Harrison, boy whore of Lake Lanier.
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 2:48 am    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

On 28 Jul 2005 18:36:46 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
Goo Fuckwit wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:43:48 GMT, Rudy wrote:

Ron Prickcheese Hamilton wrote:


Goo Fuckwit wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (UTC), peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan) wrote:


banmilk@hotmail.com turpitued:


dh@. wrote:

Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Years ago the squirrels at Stanley Park in Vancouver B.C. would run
over to people in anticipation of being fed.

They would chatter a mean streak at you if you had no peanuts to give
them.

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food.

He sure wouldn't do that if he didn't anticipate something to eat.
He has probably even learned to recognise some people who help
him out a lot....probably mostly girls imo.




The anecdotal evidence presented on this thread proves two points:

It doesn't.

As banmilk said,

Ron Prickcheese Hamilton farted. He didn't say anything.


a. Animals are able to anticipate.

Wrong.

No,

Yes. It's wrong.

If hawks could not anticipate, they would starve to death Goo.

Quote:
If it's not anticipation which causes the bird to give the very clear
impression that it's experiencing anticipation

The bird does NOT give any such impression,

Yes, it very clearly does. Its behavior would not be possible if
it were unable to anticipate. That much is very obvious.

Quote:
Goo Fuckwit. You, because
of your emotional disorder, think you're seeing anticipation in the
bird.

No, it's the other way Goober...your mental disorder does not allow
you to understand what's going on.

Quote:
You aren't - you're merely projecting your desires.

What do you "think" causes the bird to act like it's anticipating
getting food from people Gonad?

Quote:
b. Goobernicus is stupid beyond belief.

There is no one named "goobernicus".

That's

There is no one named "goobernicus".
_________________________________________________________

http://www.google.com/search?q=goobernicus&hl=en&lr=&filter=0

Web Results 1 - 10 of about 14 for goobernicus. (0.16 seconds)

NewsBackup.com ~ View topic - The cowardice of Goo
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius ... significant issues
which Goobernicus has lied about repeatedly, he has been able to do nothing but ...
www.newsbackup.com/post-4636424.html - 80k - Cached - Similar pages

Pet Central: Pet News - Google Goo
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius and enjoys being referred
.... Goobernicus Gonad says that Darwin was projecting. This is classic! ...
pet-rights.pet-central.us/article/talk.politics.animals/103865-Google_Goo.html - 14k - Cached - Similar pages

Pet Central: Pet News - Re: Google Goo
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius and enjoys being referred
... Goobernicus Gonad says that Darwin was projecting. This is classic! ...
pet-rights.pet-central.us/article/talk.politics.animals/103884-Re_Google_Goo.html - 15k - Cached - Similar pages

Pet Central: Pet News - Re: The filth of Skanky
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius and enjoys being referred
to simply as "Goo"--has proven himself an incredible coward. ...
pet-rights.pet-central.us/article/talk.politics.animals/103817-Re_The_filth_of_Skanky.html - 18k - Cached - Similar
pages

Pet Central: Pet News - Re: The filth of Skanky
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius and enjoys being referred
to simply as "Goo"--has proven himself an incredible coward. ...
pet-rights.pet-central.us/article/talk.politics.animals/103820-Re_The_filth_of_Skanky.html - 22k - Cached - Similar
pages

Pet Central: Pet News - Re: The filth of car-less Skanky
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius and enjoys being referred
to simply as "Goo"--has proven himself an incredible coward. ...
pet-rights.pet-central.us/article/talk.politics.animals/103821-Re_The_filth_of_car_less_Skanky.html - 21k - Cached -
Similar pages

Pet Central: Pet News - Re: The filth of Skanky
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius and enjoys being referred
to simply as "Goo"--has proven himself an incredible coward. ...
pet-rights.pet-central.us/article/talk.politics.animals/103818-Re_The_filth_of_Skanky.html - 19k - Cached - Similar
pages

Pet Central: Pet News - Re: The filth of car-less Skanky
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius and enjoys being referred
to simply as "Goo"--has proven himself an incredible coward. ...
pet-rights.pet-central.us/article/talk.politics.animals/103826-Re_The_filth_of_car_less_Skanky.html - 21k - Cached -
Similar pages

Golden Retriever Forum - Dogs and anticipation?
Goo is short for Goobernicus. You're so funny. You kill me every time. >It would
be hilarious to see him >try to defend his beliefs, but he is most likely ...
www.goldenretrieverforum.com/printthread.php?t=3734 - 22k - Cached - Similar pages

Golden Retriever Forum - Dogs and anticipation?
Goo is short for Goobernicus. You're so funny. You kill me every time. >It would
be hilarious to see him >try to defend his beliefs, but he is most likely ...
www.goldenretrieverforum.com/showthread.php?t=3734&page=1&pp=10 - 68k - Cached - Similar pages

Web Results 11 - 14 of 14 for goobernicus. (0.04 seconds)

Golden Retriever Forum - Dogs and anticipation?
Goo is short for Goobernicus. You're so funny. You kill me every time. >It would
be hilarious to see him >try to defend his beliefs, but he is most likely ...
www.goldenretrieverforum.com/showthread.php?mode=hybrid&t=3734 - 76k - Cached - Similar pages

Feed Viewer: Feed Details - The Feed Directory
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks hes a genius and enjoys being referred
to simply as Goo--has proven himself an incredible coward. ...
www.thefeeddirectory.com/p/Feed-Viewer-talkaboutcookingcom-Vegan___218,,,45101.html - 20k - Cached - Similar pages

Pet Central: Pet News - Re: the utter defeat of Goo
.... and probably has thought so all of his life, he doesn't learn. Therefore he
is an ignorant moron deserving of the title Goobernicus. Pet Central ...
pet-rights.pet-central.us/article/talk.politics.animals/103869-Re_the_utter_defeat_of_Goo.html - 15k - Cached - Similar
pages

Animals cannot be disappointed.
Goobernicus Gonad says that Darwin was projecting. This is classic! ... You are
Goobernicus Gonad. You "think" you are a genius ...
www.pet-manual.co.uk/showthread/t-36756.html - 208k - Cached - Similar pages
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
Back to top
Rudy Canoza
Guest





Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 3:02 am    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

Goo Fuckwit, THE Goo, wrote:

Quote:
On 28 Jul 2005 18:36:46 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote:


Goo Fuckwit wrote:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:43:48 GMT, Rudy wrote:


Ron Prickcheese Hamilton wrote:


Goo Fuckwit wrote:


On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (UTC), peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan) wrote:



banmilk@hotmail.com turpitued:


dh@. wrote:


Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Years ago the squirrels at Stanley Park in Vancouver B.C. would run
over to people in anticipation of being fed.

They would chatter a mean streak at you if you had no peanuts to give
them.

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food.

He sure wouldn't do that if he didn't anticipate something to eat.
He has probably even learned to recognise some people who help
him out a lot....probably mostly girls imo.




The anecdotal evidence presented on this thread proves two points:

It doesn't.

As banmilk said,

Ron Prickcheese Hamilton farted. He didn't say anything.



a. Animals are able to anticipate.

Wrong.

No,

Yes. It's wrong.


If hawks could not anticipate

They can't.


Quote:
If it's not anticipation which causes the bird to give the very clear
impression that it's experiencing anticipation

The bird does NOT give any such impression,


Yes, it very clearly does.

No, Goo. It very clearly does NOT.


Quote:
Goo Fuckwit. You, because
of your emotional disorder, think you're seeing anticipation in the
bird.


No, it's the other way

No, it is exactly the way I have given: because of
your pro-"ar" emotional disorder, you think you're
seeing anticipation in birds. You are not.



Quote:
You aren't - you're merely projecting your desires.


What do you "think" causes the bird to act like it's anticipating

It doesn't. It doesn't anticipate, and it doesn't even
act as it it anticipates. You are deluding yourself
into seeing what you want to see. It isn't there.



Quote:
b. Goobernicus is stupid beyond belief.

There is no one named "goobernicus".

That's

There is no one named "goobernicus".
Animals cannot be disappointed.

???

There is no one named "goobernicus".

You, Fuckwit David Harrison, are Goo.
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 7:01 am    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

Rudy Canoza wrote:
Quote:
Goo Fuckwit, THE Goo, wrote:

On 28 Jul 2005 18:36:46 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote:


Goo Fuckwit wrote:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:43:48 GMT, Rudy wrote:


Ron Prickcheese Hamilton wrote:


Goo Fuckwit wrote:


On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (UTC), peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan) wrote:



banmilk@hotmail.com turpitued:


dh@. wrote:


Ducks know that some people will feed them, and the proof
is the fact that they will come to places and wait to be fed.
Over a dozen of them would gather at sundown behind a guy's
boat down the dock, and wait due to anticipation of the feed
he would give them.

Years ago the squirrels at Stanley Park in Vancouver B.C. would run
over to people in anticipation of being fed.

They would chatter a mean streak at you if you had no peanuts to give
them.

There's a path that runs between my side of the university campus and
the main food outlets. Mostly the humans using the path and the
birds flying about ignore one another, but there's one magpie that
waits beside the path for anyone coming past carrying food. Once
he's spotted a likely victim, he'll run beside the person for
a hundred metres or more, begging for food.

He sure wouldn't do that if he didn't anticipate something to eat.
He has probably even learned to recognise some people who help
him out a lot....probably mostly girls imo.




The anecdotal evidence presented on this thread proves two points:

It doesn't.

As banmilk said,

Ron Prickcheese Hamilton farted. He didn't say anything.



a. Animals are able to anticipate.

Wrong.

No,

Yes. It's wrong.


If hawks could not anticipate

They can't.


If it's not anticipation which causes the bird to give the very clear
impression that it's experiencing anticipation

The bird does NOT give any such impression,


Yes, it very clearly does.

No, Goo. It very clearly does NOT.


Goo Fuckwit. You, because
of your emotional disorder, think you're seeing anticipation in the
bird.


No, it's the other way

No, it is exactly the way I have given: because of
your pro-"ar" emotional disorder, you think you're
seeing anticipation in birds. You are not.



You aren't - you're merely projecting your desires.


What do you "think" causes the bird to act like it's anticipating

It doesn't. It doesn't anticipate, and it doesn't even
act as it it anticipates. You are deluding yourself
into seeing what you want to see. It isn't there.



b. Goobernicus is stupid beyond belief.

There is no one named "goobernicus".

That's

There is no one named "goobernicus".
Animals cannot be disappointed.

???

There is no one named "goobernicus".

Yes. Yes there is. He is Goobernicus Gonad (aka Jon Ball, Rudy Canoza,)


Quote:

You, Fuckwit David Harrison, are Goo.


No ~jonnie~. YOU are the GOO!
Back to top
David Wright Sr.
Guest





Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 7:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

dh@. wrote in news:nfkse156kd7bu2u5bv4v66k95il5fo9ut7@4ax.com:

(snip)

Quote:
A bird begging for food is obviously anticipating getting some
food Goo. If you "think" it's not begging for food because it's
anticipating getting some food, then why do you "think" it's
begging for food?


Don't ask him to strain himself by 'thinking'. He can't see any intelligence
in animals, because he has none himself.

David
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

On 31 Jul 2005 18:39:23 -0700, banmilk@hotmail.com wrote:

Quote:

Rudy Canoza wrote:

Yes. Yes there is. He is Goobernicus Gonad (aka Jon Ball, Rudy Canoza,)

Here's a partial list of posters that Goo has dishonestly pretended
to be over the years:

Jonathan Ball
Citizen
Benfez
Wilson Woods
Radical Moderate
Bingo
Edward
George
Bill
Fred
Mystery Poster
Merlin the dog
Bob the dog
silvia@onairos.com
elvira
Dieter
"Dieter d.Schmidt@deutsche_telekom.de"
<prickerbush2004@yahoo.com>
Abner Hale
Roger Whitaker
Fucktard
Apoo
Ted Bell
notgenx32@yahoo.com
Jay Santos
mortons.steakhouse@chicago.not
Rudy Canoza
Trappist
sb292sb@yahoo.com

Quote:
You, Fuckwit David Harrison, are Goo.


No ~jonnie~. YOU are the GOO!

It certainly shows off Goo's shallowness, stupidity,
and childlike type of "imagination" that after I began
calling him Goober, the *best* he could do was to
begin calling me Goober. Then after I began to refer to
him as Goo, he started calling me Goo. I don't believe
there's any way Goo could have showed his Goobal
nature and lack of creativity more clearly. What a Gooball.
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:02:54 GMT, Goo wrote:

Quote:
dh wrote:

If it's not anticipation which causes the bird to give the very clear
impression that it's experiencing anticipation

The bird does NOT give any such impression,

A bird begging for food is obviously anticipating getting some
food Goo. If you "think" it's not begging for food because it's
anticipating getting some food, then why do you "think" it's
begging for food?
Back to top
Rudy Canoza
Guest





Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:36 am    Post subject: Re: Proof of anticipation in ducks Reply with quote

dh@. wrote:

Quote:
Here's a partial list of posters that Goo has dishonestly pretended
to be over the years:

Jonathan Ball
Citizen
Benfez
Wilson Woods
Radical Moderate

No. I never used that.


Quote:
Bingo
Edward
George
Bill
Fred
Mystery Poster

Nope.

Quote:
Merlin the dog

No.

Quote:
Bob the dog
silvia@onairos.com
elvira

No.


Quote:
Dieter
"Dieter d.Schmidt@deutsche_telekom.de"
prickerbush2004@yahoo.com
Abner Hale

No.


Quote:
Roger Whitaker
Fucktard
Apoo
Ted Bell
notgenx32@yahoo.com
Jay Santos
mortons.steakhouse@chicago.not
Rudy Canoza
Trappist

No.


Quote:
sb292sb@yahoo.com


You, Fuckwit David Harrison, are Goo.


No ~jonnie~. YOU are the GOO!


It certainly shows off Rudy's shallowness, stupidity,
and childlike type of "imagination" that after I began
calling him Goober, the *best* he could do was to
begin calling me Goober.

No. You *are* the Goober, Fuckwit. "Goober" is a term
of derision aimed and ignorant Southern rednecks.
That's you.
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vocaboly.com Forum Index -> alt.english.usage All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Office Forum Access Forum Electronics Windows Server Exchange Server
Powered by phpBB