| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:38 am
Post subject: Re: Shulam Thompson |
|
|
What does any of this have to do with classical music, Comm, you
ignorant slut?
Comm wrote:
| Quote: | Let me inform you of a few things, shulam. Not all Tatars speak Khalka in
some kind of "standard fashion." Not all speak Khalka at all. Blyah. I
understood most of what you said - despite not speaking or hearing any of it
for over 40 years - and to top that off, I never heard KHALKA at all - no
one spoke that - not one person. The laughability of it - those "spellings"
you use only started with Lenin and Stalin - enforced on people that, aside
from the Islamic ones, had no "standard" writing at all. It was the real
Tatars, the ones who are now Islamic, that gave Lenin and Stalin a run for
their money, wrecking stuff and getting away with it. None of the younger
generation speak anything except English. Who the freaking hell are YOU to
say who speaks a barbaric language? You are just a White Man - so it
figures you'd say some rubbish like that, pretending to be some kind of
overlord.
Those people living there now, all meek and passive, especially the ones who
come here to the U.S. and have this "morbid obesity" problem, even in the
kids have it - are NOT the same people that used to be there who had bloody
conquering tendencies and not a shred of meekness.
Chinese policy toward those of us that never wandered more westerly was
GENOCIDE - and their peculiar way of doing it (when not doing it the normal
way, like how whites did it to Native Americans) was to breed with us making
us NO LONGER US. That's why you see what we call, in derogatory talk, all
those kharmurnum, tuvugtsarai, turug khumoos. Bwhahaha. Khudalkhan.
I kid you not. SOME of the Derbets have that unfortunate look, definitely
not all - know how the ones who don't look like that view them. They need
only look at Uzbeki to see what the Khans looked like. The character is
also very different. For one thing, no one would ever mistake us for
Chinese - and that's historically true. You talking about barbaric Tatar -
that's like when your kind was assuming that all the Native Americans spoke
ONE language - or that any of the languages they did speak were barbaric.
But then, not so long ago, people with names like Thompson were saying that
the Native Americans BARKED instead of talked. You have not changed a bit,
shulam.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John W. Kennedy
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:06 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Harlan Messinger wrote:
| Quote: | I believe it is. The press says plenty of nasty things about people that
are true, and Britain is considered to have a pretty free press. What
*differs* between US and UK libel law, AIUI, is that in the US libel
requires a finding that the accused knew or should have known of the
untruth of what he was saying, or something to that effect, whereas in
the UK the test is much weaker than that. Again, AIUI.
|
Not quite. A "public figure" must prove that the libeler either knew the
story to be false or "showed reckless disregard for the truth", but a
plaintif who is not a public figure has it easier.
In the US, truth is an absolute defense against a charge of libel. In
England, certain classes of statement are regarded as libelous even if
true. I don't know about Scotland.
--
John W. Kennedy
"Sweet, was Christ crucified to create this chat?"
-- Charles Williams. "Judgement at Chelmsford" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:33 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Comm wrote:
| Quote: | Stop talking to me. Why the hell you'd talk to me is a Big Mystery.
|
I had planned to do so until you farted a few more of your idiocies.
You might have stopped with this posting, teneg.
| Quote: | You have NOTHING to say to me.
|
Quite the contrary--judging from your evident abyssmal stupidity of the
history of Inner Asia, I have quite a lot to say to you; you're just
not interested in hearing it.
| Quote: | Not even "OH, a Mongol person; very
interesting." What's so interesting about it? What? I'm Derbet
Uzbeki and
Russian - and I speak ENGLISH.
|
What was interesting is that someone was posting in Mongolian. That's
very rare, and I was pleased. But no, as I learned after I posted the
first time and read a few more of your postings, you're quite right,
you personally are not in the least bit interesting.
| Quote: | But, OH WOW, a white guy - how very interesting.
|
More interesting than you by far. Mikael Thompson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:44 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Comm wrote:
| Quote: | None of us speak KHALKA - and I pretty much told him so. The very
idea of a
"standard" language of historically constantly moving nomadic people
is
laughable.
|
It's the standard language of the Mongolian republic, like it or not,
teneg. And most Mongols have been largely sedentary since the 17th
century and the second conversion to Buddhism; Mongolian nomadism
consists of circulating around the same three or four seasonal pastures
year in, year out.
| Quote: | "Best stay out of" my butt.
|
I've been trying to avoid your butt, yet you keep sticking it in
everyone's face. Mikael Thompson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:31 am
Post subject: Re: Shulam Thompson |
|
|
Comm wrote:
| Quote: | Let me inform you of a few things, shulam. Not all Tatars speak
Khalka in
some kind of "standard fashion." Not all speak Khalka at all.
|
No shit, moron.
| Quote: | I
understood most of what you said - despite not speaking or hearing
any of it
for over 40 years - and to top that off, I never heard KHALKA at all
- no
one spoke that - not one person.
|
You're forgetting you posted enough that I could tell you'd understand
it.
| Quote: | The laughability of it - those "spellings"
you use only started with Lenin and Stalin - enforced on people that,
aside
from the Islamic ones, had no "standard" writing at all.
|
I see, so Classical Mongolian script and Oirat clear script weren't
standard writing systems?
| Quote: | It was the real
Tatars, the ones who are now Islamic, that gave Lenin and Stalin a
run for
their money, wrecking stuff and getting away with it. None of the
younger
generation speak anything except English. Who the freaking hell are
YOU to
say who speaks a barbaric language?
|
No, you foaming, yipping little dog, I was mocking you and the way you
like to indulge your anti-Khalkha prejudices: "whatsit Tatar dialect."
The way you like to go on about how they're not "real" Tatars, the way
you revel in insulting those who are "unfortunate" enough to look too
Chinese to you, the way they use Cyrillic script. You're exactly the
sort who'd call their speech "barbaric" to their face because they're
not "real Tatars" like you, you moronic bigot, or because they are
"unfortunate" enough not to look like Uzbeks, or because they all look
Chinese.
| Quote: | You are just a White Man - so it
figures you'd say some rubbish like that, pretending to be some kind
of
overlord.
|
You're just a stuck-up ignorant little bigot who likes to talk trash
about anyone who looks too Chinese or who talks too much like a
Khalkha. Perhaps you have a classic Mongol face; that doesn't excuse
you having such a petty, bigoted, shit-filled soul.
| Quote: | Those people living there now, all meek and passive, especially the
ones who
come here to the U.S. and have this "morbid obesity" problem, even in
the
kids have it - are NOT the same people that used to be there who had
bloody
conquering tendencies and not a shred of meekness.
|
Happens when you have three and a half centuries of Buddhism followed
by seventy years of Soviet communism.
| Quote: | Chinese policy toward those of us that never wandered more westerly
was
GENOCIDE - and their peculiar way of doing it (when not doing it the
normal
way, like how whites did it to Native Americans) was to breed with us
making
us NO LONGER US. That's why you see what we call, in derogatory
talk, all
those kharmurnum, tuvugtsarai, turug khumoos. Bwhahaha. Khudalkhan.
|
Uh-huh. You ignorant little bigot.
| Quote: | I kid you not. SOME of the Derbets have that unfortunate look,
definitely
not all - know how the ones who don't look like that view them.
|
"Unfortunate." I see, you little bigot.
| Quote: | You talking about barbaric Tatar -
that's like when your kind was assuming that all the Native Americans
spoke
ONE language - or that any of the languages they did speak were
barbaric. |
Funny, I was the one who pointed out the various peoples you lump
together as "Tatars" all spoke different languages. You're the one who
assumed they all spoke ONE language not so very long ago.
| Quote: | But then, not so long ago, people with names like Thompson were
saying that
the Native Americans BARKED instead of talked.
|
"People with names like Thompson"--nice dodge. "Chinese sounds like
cats meowing and Vietnamese sounds worse." (Note, you said "worse."
It's clear that whatever you have claimed since then, you think Chinese
sounds bad, just like you've made damned clear you don't like their
looks either.) You're the only one in this thread making bigoted
comments comparing other languages to animal cries. Baasaa ideed yav,
nokhoi.
Mikael Thompson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Comm
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 2:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Shulam Thompson |
|
|
<mithomps@indiana.edu> wrote in message
news:1112499093.342824.176760@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
Comm wrote:
Let me inform you of a few things, shulam. Not all Tatars speak
Khalka in
some kind of "standard fashion." Not all speak Khalka at all.
No shit, moron.
|
Shut up, shulam.
| Quote: |
I
understood most of what you said - despite not speaking or hearing
any of it
for over 40 years - and to top that off, I never heard KHALKA at all
- no
one spoke that - not one person.
You're forgetting you posted enough that I could tell you'd understand
it.
|
I did? A few words. Maybe 4 words.
| Quote: |
The laughability of it - those "spellings"
you use only started with Lenin and Stalin - enforced on people that,
aside
from the Islamic ones, had no "standard" writing at all.
I see, so Classical Mongolian script and Oirat clear script weren't
standard writing systems?
|
The syllabery? Uighur writing? Most never knew it.
| Quote: |
It was the real
Tatars, the ones who are now Islamic, that gave Lenin and Stalin a
run for
their money, wrecking stuff and getting away with it. None of the
younger
generation speak anything except English. Who the freaking hell are
YOU to
say who speaks a barbaric language?
No, you foaming, yipping little dog,
|
LMAO. HA HAA, that's funny, gichee. LMAO.
I was mocking you and the way you
| Quote: | like to indulge your anti-Khalkha prejudices: "whatsit Tatar dialect."
|
That was a mock of YOU, teneg. You do realize you went from K to X? xox
instead of kok for blue?
| Quote: | The way you like to go on about how they're not "real" Tatars, the way
you revel in insulting those who are "unfortunate" enough to look too
Chinese to you, the way they use Cyrillic script. You're exactly the
sort who'd call their speech "barbaric" to their face because they're
not "real Tatars" like you, you moronic bigot, or because they are
"unfortunate" enough not to look like Uzbeks, or because they all look
Chinese.
|
They look Chinese now because they ARE Chinese. They just don't want to BE
Chinese. We all know that, not just me. It's the same thing very light
skinned blacks talk about at the Nation of Islam and openly have said on
talk shows - HOW did they get to look like that? - they challenge/ask Via
RAPE, that's how. It's the same identical thing.
| Quote: |
You are just a White Man - so it
figures you'd say some rubbish like that, pretending to be some kind
of
overlord.
You're just a stuck-up ignorant little bigot who likes to talk trash
about anyone who looks too Chinese or who talks too much like a
Khalkha. Perhaps you have a classic Mongol face; that doesn't excuse
you having such a petty, bigoted, shit-filled soul.
|
Heh, not just me. EVERYONE. Where do you think I heard those words of, what
I admitted, were derision? Guess you understood them! You think I just
heard them ONCE? After 40 freaking years, some of those words are STILL
words that people that don't even speak anymore still know. I grew up with
Tatars. I do not have a shit filled soul. I'm mocking YOU. That's what
people call them. I said it was derogatory. My soul is The Light that
Burns in the Boundless Darkness. You can't touch it. You don't know the
dynamic - like when they come all high minded pretending THEY are the real
Khan's people. BULL SHIT they are!
| Quote: |
Those people living there now, all meek and passive, especially the
ones who
come here to the U.S. and have this "morbid obesity" problem, even in
the
kids have it - are NOT the same people that used to be there who had
bloody
conquering tendencies and not a shred of meekness.
Happens when you have three and a half centuries of Buddhism followed
by seventy years of Soviet communism.
|
Oh really. We aren't like that at all. Not even over there in xUSSR!
| Quote: |
Chinese policy toward those of us that never wandered more westerly
was
GENOCIDE - and their peculiar way of doing it (when not doing it the
normal
way, like how whites did it to Native Americans) was to breed with us
making
us NO LONGER US. That's why you see what we call, in derogatory
talk, all
those kharmurnum, tuvugtsarai, turug khumoos. Bwhahaha. Khudalkhan.
Uh-huh. You ignorant little bigot.
|
No, the CHINESE were the bigots - and you don't want to face that. They DID
that - BIG time - and we all know they did it. It's an historical FACT,
buster. Go ahead, try to wish it away.
| Quote: |
I kid you not. SOME of the Derbets have that unfortunate look,
definitely
not all - know how the ones who don't look like that view them.
"Unfortunate." I see, you little bigot.
|
Yah - they know where they go it, in the end. HOW it came about - as I said
above - so do some nationalist NoI blacks. They RESENT that.
| Quote: |
You talking about barbaric Tatar -
that's like when your kind was assuming that all the Native Americans
spoke
ONE language - or that any of the languages they did speak were
barbaric.
Funny, I was the one who pointed out the various peoples you lump
together as "Tatars" all spoke different languages. You're the one who
assumed they all spoke ONE language not so very long ago.
|
BS, I never said that. And I didn't see any such post from you. I NEVER
said Tatars speak the same language - I said their languages change VERY
FAST - my whole thing was that oral languages not restricted by "proper"
grammar/dictionaries would change a lot faster than written ones.
| Quote: |
But then, not so long ago, people with names like Thompson were
saying that
the Native Americans BARKED instead of talked.
"People with names like Thompson"--nice dodge. "Chinese sounds like
cats meowing and Vietnamese sounds worse." (Note, you said "worse."
It's clear that whatever you have claimed since then, you think Chinese
sounds bad, just like you've made damned clear you don't like their
looks either.)
|
Assumptions. I think Wei Pei is GOD gorgeous. English sounds like dogs
barking and German sounds worse. I happen to LIKE German speech. So you
are wrong.
You're the only one in this thread making bigoted
| Quote: | comments comparing other languages to animal cries. Baasaa ideed yav,
nokhoi.
|
HAAAAAAAAAA, chetger. LMAO LMAO.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ruud Harmsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 2:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
{ about "you ignorant slut" ]
Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:14:45 -0800: "Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of
recirculation')" <pristoplainical@plazmototifficatious.org>: in
sci.lang:
| Quote: | It's actually an American idomatic expression
|
Not everybody here understand American idioms. Please use proper
international English instead.
| Quote: | that isn't really very offensive.
|
It sounds offensive to me. I'm not going to keep a dictionary of
American slang handy all the time (I don't even have one) just to read
sci.lang.
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Comm
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
"Ruud Harmsen" <realemailseesite01@rudhar.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:ujbv41lkrd786fep3gqof6n5ksqfv62rso@4ax.com...
| Quote: | { about "you ignorant slut" ]
Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:14:45 -0800: "Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of
recirculation')" <pristoplainical@plazmototifficatious.org>: in
sci.lang:
It's actually an American idomatic expression
Not everybody here understand American idioms. Please use proper
international English instead.
|
I live in America. I was born in America. I never heard that said as a
"funny expression" either. And indeed, if the man said that to my face,
he'd get a bottle broken over his head, lye thrown in his face or a lot
worse. The thing is, I doubt any of these arm chair wussies would say
something like that to anyone to their face. That's WHY they do it behind
the computer.
| Quote: |
that isn't really very offensive.
|
Let me see them say it to a female professor at their college. Let me see
them say it to a black student in their college. I dare them. I don't have
familiarity with things like "Saturday Night Live" where they said they got
it. When that was on in the 70s I was working double shifts and making good
money. I didn't have time for stupid crap. And I don't relate to the
social rot that resulted in massive spread of STDs in the country. Neither
do most people. That's why eg, in Naples FL everyone was open wallets for
the tsunami victims - but no one gives a damned about the massive spread of
AIDS at all - it's become a footnote. I can see that mentality - it goes
like this: I don't know anyone with such a disease - and probably never
will. And so just what is about about the many people I know and/or hang
with that is so different from the people who have that disease and know so
many others that have it? That's the mentality. The women have to be -
SLUTS - and the men are like uncontrolled dogs - or also SLUTS.
I notice the sexual connotation - and I freaking hate that crap.
| Quote: |
It sounds offensive to me. I'm not going to keep a dictionary of
American slang handy all the time (I don't even have one) just to read
sci.lang.
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill Bonde ('by a commodi
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:09 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Ruud Harmsen wrote:
| Quote: |
{ about "you ignorant slut" ]
Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:14:45 -0800: "Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of
recirculation')" <pristoplainical@plazmototifficatious.org>: in
sci.lang:
It's actually an American idomatic expression
Not everybody here understand American idioms. Please use proper
international English instead.
This is not a scientific paper but an internet newsgroup. At least one |
of the groups in the crosspost deals specifically with English language
usage including idiomatic expressions and various non-standard
culturally referented expressions.
| Quote: | that isn't really very offensive.
It sounds offensive to me. I'm not going to keep a dictionary of
American slang handy all the time (I don't even have one) just to read
sci.lang.
It seems like knowing French is required to read at least some of |
sci.lang. Search google for the words "ignorant slut" brings up as its
*first* hit a page on the very term:
http://www.comedystars.com/Bios/curtin_jane.shtml
#begin quote
On "Saturday Night Live" some of the laughs came from Jane's chafing
against lower class idiots. She glared with undisguised disgust at
Radner's Roseanne Rosanadanna and simmered with indignity over Dan
Aykroyd's insults ("Jane, you ignorant slut!") during their parodies of
the "60 Minutes" debates between Shana Alexander and James Kirkpatrick.
On the set, most noted the real disdain the level-headed and
quiet-living Curtin had for slob co-star John Belushi. Sometimes Curtin
found it difficult to remain aloof from the chaotic comic behavior that
went on both backstage and in front of the camera.
#end quote
Next thing you'll do is claim you don't get references to the "Super
Bass-o-Matic".
http://snltranscripts.jt.org/75/75qbassamatic.phtml
#begin quote
Super Bass-o-matic '76
Spokesman.....Dan Aykroyd
Bass-Drinker.....Laraine Newman
Spokesman: How many times has this happened to you? You have a bass, and
you're trying to find an exciting new way to prepare it for the dinner
table. You could scale the bass, remove the bass' tail, head and bones,
and serve the fish as you would any other fish dinner. But why bother,
now that you can use Rovco's amazing new kitchen tool, the Super
Bass-o-Matic '76. Yes, fish-eaters, the days of troublesome scaling,
cutting and gutting are over, because Super Bass-o-Matic '76 is the tool
that lets you use the bass with no fish waste, and without scaling,
cutting or gutting.
Here's how it works: Catch a bass, remove the hook, and drop the bass -
that's the whole bass - into the Super Bass-o-Matic '76. [ drops the
bass into the blender ] Now, adjust the control dial so that the bass is
blended just the way you like it. [ turns blender on and grinds it to a
pulp ] Yes, it's that simple!
Bass-Drinker: [ drinks a glassful of bass ] Wow, that's terrific bass!
Spokesman: We've got fish here, fast and easy and ready to pour,
mmm-mmm! Super Bass-o-Matic '76 comes with ten interchangeable rotors, a
nine-month guarantee, and a booklet: 1,001 Ways to Harness Bass. Super
Bass-o-Matic '76 works great on sunfish, perch, sole, and other small
aquatic creatures. [ blends one of each ]
Super Bass-o-Matic '76 - it's clean, simple, and after five or ten fish,
it gets to be quite a rush! Super Bass-o-Matic '76 - you'll never have
to scale, cut or gut again!
#end quote |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Lieblich
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:04 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
[trimmed to AUE]
Bill Bonde wrote:
[ ... ]
| Quote: | Super Bass-o-Matic '76 - it's clean, simple, and after five or ten fish,
it gets to be quite a rush! Super Bass-o-Matic '76 - you'll never have
to scale, cut or gut again!
|
My God, that was almost thirty years ago. Dan Aykroyd was still
thin, and Man, could he talk fast. Back then, Laraine Newman was
almost attractive. (Anyone else remember her as the child
psychiatrist?)
Variant quotation (as I remember it) from Laraine: "Mmmmmmmmm,
that's good bass."
In the US, at least, I'm pretty sure the E! cable network has the
rights to all SNL episodes, including those from the very first
years. They seem to be running stuff from the 90s right now. A
quick look at the Web doesn't reveal any DVDs that simply reproduce
the shows from the early years. Oh, well, I've still got my Monty
Python tapes.
--
Liebs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Michael Haslam
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:30 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation') <stderr@mail.com>
wrote:
| Quote: |
Next thing you'll do is claim you don't get references to the "Super
Bass-o-Matic".
http://snltranscripts.jt.org/75/75qbassamatic.phtml
#begin quote
Super Bass-o-matic '76
Spokesman.....Dan Aykroyd
Bass-Drinker.....Laraine Newman
Spokesman: How many times has this happened to you? You have a bass, and
you're trying to find an exciting new way to prepare it for the dinner
table. You could scale the bass, remove the bass' tail, head and bones,
and serve the fish as you would any other fish dinner. But why bother,
now that you can use Rovco's amazing new kitchen tool, the Super
Bass-o-Matic '76. Yes, fish-eaters, the days of troublesome scaling,
cutting and gutting are over, because Super Bass-o-Matic '76 is the tool
that lets you use the bass with no fish waste, and without scaling,
cutting or gutting.
Here's how it works: Catch a bass, remove the hook, and drop the bass -
that's the whole bass - into the Super Bass-o-Matic '76. [ drops the
bass into the blender ] Now, adjust the control dial so that the bass is
blended just the way you like it. [ turns blender on and grinds it to a
pulp ] Yes, it's that simple!
Bass-Drinker: [ drinks a glassful of bass ] Wow, that's terrific bass!
Spokesman: We've got fish here, fast and easy and ready to pour,
mmm-mmm! Super Bass-o-Matic '76 comes with ten interchangeable rotors, a
nine-month guarantee, and a booklet: 1,001 Ways to Harness Bass. Super
Bass-o-Matic '76 works great on sunfish, perch, sole, and other small
aquatic creatures. [ blends one of each ]
Super Bass-o-Matic '76 - it's clean, simple, and after five or ten fish,
it gets to be quite a rush! Super Bass-o-Matic '76 - you'll never have
to scale, cut or gut again!
#end quote
|
Presumably the control dial goes up to 11.
--
MJHaslam
Remove accidentals to obtain correct e-address
"Can't you show a little restraint?" - Dr. David Tholen |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tor Aschan
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 7:35 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation') wrote:
| Quote: | Ruud Harmsen wrote:
{ about "you ignorant slut" ]
Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:14:45 -0800: "Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus
of
recirculation')" <pristoplainical@plazmototifficatious.org>: in
sci.lang:
It's actually an American idomatic expression
Not everybody here understand American idioms. Please use proper
international English instead.
This is not a scientific paper but an internet newsgroup. At least
one
of the groups in the crosspost deals specifically with English
language
usage including idiomatic expressions and various non-standard
culturally referented expressions.
that isn't really very offensive.
It sounds offensive to me. I'm not going to keep a dictionary of
American slang handy all the time (I don't even have one) just to
read
sci.lang.
It seems like knowing French is required to read at least some of
sci.lang. Search google for the words "ignorant slut" brings up as
its
*first* hit a page on the very term:
http://www.comedystars.com/Bios/curtin_jane.shtml
#begin quote
On "Saturday Night Live" some of the laughs came from Jane's chafing
against lower class idiots. She glared with undisguised disgust at
Radner's Roseanne Rosanadanna and simmered with indignity over Dan
Aykroyd's insults ("Jane, you ignorant slut!") during their parodies
of
the "60 Minutes" debates between Shana Alexander and James
Kirkpatrick.
On the set, most noted the real disdain the level-headed and
quiet-living Curtin had for slob co-star John Belushi. Sometimes
Curtin
found it difficult to remain aloof from the chaotic comic behavior
that
went on both backstage and in front of the camera.
#end quote
|
Whether or not Comm has been crude,
We ourselves should not be rude.
Humor is good but it should stop
When it has gone over the top.
"Ignorant slut" -- that's not a joke
Women should hear said by a bloke.
Tor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Comm
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 7:36 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
"Tor Aschan" <tor826@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1112580976.445950.5900@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Whether or not Comm has been crude,
We ourselves should not be rude.
Humor is good but it should stop
When it has gone over the top.
"Ignorant slut" -- that's not a joke
Women should hear said by a bloke.
|
BRAVO - for the record, I got rude after rudeness was spewn my way about 10
times first. It's not a joke when it's said **in conjunction** with other
things. Rudeness was also simultaneously aimed at the poster Paul KM and
Martin P. the physicist.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ruud Harmsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:17:57 +0100: António Marques <m.ap@sapo.pt>: in
sci.lang:
| Quote: | Ruud Harmsen wrote:
I think, without wishing to offend you, Ruud, you are missing Matt's
point. Read the thread again paying particular attention to the origins
of the phrase "you ignorant slut".
I won't and I don't care.
Then you might as well not care for 'it's the people, stupid!'.
|
Like "keep it simple, stupid!", the KISS principle. Not offensive,
you're right.
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
FAQ
Memberlist
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in