Vocaboly.com

[Matthew Fields]

In article <S8n3e.10292$z.9231@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:

[Mikael Thompson]

Comm wrote:

[Michael Haslam]

Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:

[Ruud Harmsen]

Sat, 02 Apr 2005 02:44:38 GMT: "Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov>: in
sci.lang:

[Paul J Kriha]

Mikael Thompson <mithomps@indiana.edu> wrote in message
news:d2l1va$uva$1@rainier.uits.indiana.edu...

[Matthew Fields]

In article <nqr3e.13027$S46.5670@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:

[Matthew Fields]

In article <rips41t4v6ab1qqgpd6aj4qqbjqqldth7b@4ax.com>,
Ruud Harmsen <realemailseesite01@rudhar.com.invalid> wrote:

[Brian M. Scott]

On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 22:02:02 -0500, Mikael Thompson
<mithomps@indiana.edu> wrote in
<news:d2l1va$uva$1@rainier.uits.indiana.edu> in
sci.anthropology,sci.lang,rec.music.classical,alt.usage.english,nyc.transit:

[...]

[Ruud Harmsen]

Sat, 02 Apr 2005 14:19:04 GMT: "Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov>: in
sci.lang:

[Michael Haslam]

Ruud Harmsen <realemailseesite01@rudhar.com.invalid> wrote:

[Ruud Harmsen]

Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:10:21 +0100: innatesharp@macflat.com (Michael
Haslam): in sci.lang:

[Bill Bonde ('by a commodi]

Ruud Harmsen wrote:

[António Marques]

Ruud Harmsen wrote:

[Comm]

"Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kriha@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message
news:424e9491@clear.net.nz...

[Comm]

Let me inform you of a few things, shulam. Not all Tatars speak Khalka in
some kind of "standard fashion." Not all speak Khalka at all. Blyah. I
understood most of what you said - despite not speaking or hearing any of it
for over 40 years - and to top that off, I never heard KHALKA at all - no
one spoke that - not one person. The laughability of it - those "spellings"
you use only started with Lenin and Stalin - enforced on people that, aside
from the Islamic ones, had no "standard" writing at all. It was the real
Tatars, the ones who are now Islamic, that gave Lenin and Stalin a run for
their money, wrecking stuff and getting away with it. None of the younger
generation speak anything except English. Who the freaking hell are YOU to
say who speaks a barbaric language? You are just a White Man - so it
figures you'd say some rubbish like that, pretending to be some kind of
overlord.

Those people living there now, all meek and passive, especially the ones who
come here to the U.S. and have this "morbid obesity" problem, even in the
kids have it - are NOT the same people that used to be there who had bloody
conquering tendencies and not a shred of meekness.

Chinese policy toward those of us that never wandered more westerly was
GENOCIDE - and their peculiar way of doing it (when not doing it the normal
way, like how whites did it to Native Americans) was to breed with us making
us NO LONGER US. That's why you see what we call, in derogatory talk, all
those kharmurnum, tuvugtsarai, turug khumoos. Bwhahaha. Khudalkhan.

I kid you not. SOME of the Derbets have that unfortunate look, definitely
not all - know how the ones who don't look like that view them. They need
only look at Uzbeki to see what the Khans looked like. The character is
also very different. For one thing, no one would ever mistake us for
Chinese - and that's historically true. You talking about barbaric Tatar -
that's like when your kind was assuming that all the Native Americans spoke
ONE language - or that any of the languages they did speak were barbaric.
But then, not so long ago, people with names like Thompson were saying that
the Native Americans BARKED instead of talked. You have not changed a bit,
shulam.