| Author |
Message |
Michael Haslam
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:13 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Josh Hill <usereplyto@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:02:57 -0800, "Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus
of recirculation')"
stderr@abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com
wrote:
He's obviously trolling, which usually includes bringing into a
crosspost groups of extremely different characteristics. If you
complain, it will just encourage your group to be the target. BTW, what
do you talking about in nyc.transit, fair increases because those
bastard kids keep up their damned turnstile hopping?
Finnegans Wake.
|
I thought the original post was Mr Breen in Ullyses. UP Up.
--
MJHaslam
Remove accidentals to obtain correct e-address
"Can't you show a little restraint?" - Dr. David Tholen |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter T. Daniels
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:13 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Hi all! Even the folks at the newsgroups I don't read.
The "offending" phrase was "Comm, you ignorant slut," which ought to be
familiar to any American over the age of 40 or so.
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:
| Quote: |
Jacques Guy wrote:
Comm wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
If that's the worst anyone ever calls you on a newsgroup,
count yourself fortunate! You and the Luhan broad sound as
though you'd make a good pair. ("Libel" - Sheesh!)
I can recommend a fine law firm in Zurich... help, Mr Google...
Eberle Kämpfen Bösiger Theiler (www.ekbt-law.ch) in
Zurich, their offices are Rue de la Justice (but
it's in German, not French, something like Richtigkeit
Gasse) Ah, got it!
Gerechtigkeitsgasse 23
8002 ZÃ*rich
Telefon 01 202 97 85
Telefax 01 202 75 05
Say I sent you.
|
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Comm
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:13 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
"Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:mQH2e.147$r6.7@news.itd.umich.edu...
| Quote: | In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...]
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel, fyi.
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
|
Do you deny that your mother was a crack whore that had an abortion when you
were 1 month in her womb?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jacques Guy
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:13 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Comm wrote:
| Quote: | Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
|
I can recommend a fine law firm in Zurich... help, Mr Google...
Eberle Kämpfen Bösiger Theiler (www.ekbt-law.ch) in
Zurich, their offices are Rue de la Justice (but
it's in German, not French, something like Richtigkeit
Gasse) Ah, got it!
Gerechtigkeitsgasse 23
8002 Zürich
Telefon 01 202 97 85
Telefax 01 202 75 05
Say I sent you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill Bonde ('by a commodi
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:14 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
| Quote: |
"Comm" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the
abusive term "slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke.
There was clear hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
...
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel, fyi.
This allegedly occurred in sci.lang and sci.anthropology. Please keep your
complaints out of nyc.transit and other unrelated groups.
He's obviously trolling, which usually includes bringing into a |
crosspost groups of extremely different characteristics. If you
complain, it will just encourage your group to be the target. BTW, what
do you talking about in nyc.transit, fair increases because those
bastard kids keep up their damned turnstile hopping? Rotten punks from
the "Blackboard Jungle".
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Richard Loeb
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:14 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Isn't "ignorant slut" a joke expression now - it 's a take-off on an old
Saturday Night Live routine Richard
"Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')"
<stderr@abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com>
wrote in message
news:424B58B1.6AB509EB@abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com...
| Quote: |
Comm wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
How is calling someone a 'slut' on usenet considered 'libel'? I would
think that the use of the term 'liar', which is extremely common usenet,
would be more worthy of such a term.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bill Bonde ('by a commodi
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:14 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Comm wrote:
| Quote: |
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
How is calling someone a 'slut' on usenet considered 'libel'? I would |
think that the use of the term 'liar', which is extremely common usenet,
would be more worthy of such a term.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Agent_C
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:14 am
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:20:19 GMT, "Comm" <no@spam.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
big snip |
What an idiot...
A_C |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Charles Riggs
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 04:51:52 +0000, innatesharp@macflat.com (Michael
Haslam) wrote:
| Quote: | Josh Hill <usereplyto@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:02:57 -0800, "Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus
of recirculation')"
stderr@abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com
wrote:
He's obviously trolling, which usually includes bringing into a
crosspost groups of extremely different characteristics. If you
complain, it will just encourage your group to be the target. BTW, what
do you talking about in nyc.transit, fair increases because those
bastard kids keep up their damned turnstile hopping?
Finnegans Wake.
I thought the original post was Mr Breen in Ullyses. UP Up.
|
I've never understood why that upset the man so much. So someone
accuses someone of peeing up. I'm not sure what that entails, but it
doesn't sound like much of an insult.
Charles Riggs--
There are no accented letters in my email address. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Poet Fury
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 6:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:38:03 GMT, Steven Bornfeld wrote:
| Quote: | Matthew Fields wrote:
In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...]
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel, fyi.
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
Maybe a legal question, but can a matter of opinion be libel? And can
it be libel if the target is anonymous?
Cheeeburrrgerrr cheeeburrrrgerrrr cheeburrgerrr
|
No Coke, Pepsi
--
http://www.newvague.com/tdis/index.html
Of course it's music. It has notes in it, doesn't it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Matthew Fields
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
In article <U6N2e.9328$z.5152@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:aWJ2e.160$r6.35@news.itd.umich.edu...
In article <QtJ2e.11892$S46.3111@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
"Matthew Fields" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:mQH2e.147$r6.7@news.itd.umich.edu...
In article <7nH2e.9051$z.3848@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Comm <no@spam.com> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was
clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
[...]
THAT is libel. Three examples of it. People can be sued for libel,
fyi.
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
Do you deny that your mother was a crack whore that had an abortion when
you
were 1 month in her womb?
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such
thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
We notice that you ran away from my question, you ignorant slut.
We? Do you have MPD or something? I noticed you JUMPED on the opportunity
to bitch on obvious trolling he he he he he. Of course I'm not an ignorant
slut; I'm not your mother! Elementary, in't? For this series of posts I'm
a TROLL, you animated abortion. And you LOVE trolls - right?
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such
thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
|
You think you're such a chip but actually you're fry, you ignorant slut.
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Harlan Messinger
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Comm wrote:
| Quote: | Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
|
As far as I know, the difference between an insult and libel is whether
the writer was making an assertion, a claim, a statement intended to be
understand as fact, as information. Do you really think Peter expected
anyone to believe his remark to be a statement of fact about your sexual
activities--as though he would even have any knowledge of them? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gareth Williams
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 10:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:59:23 -0500, Richard Loeb wrote:
| Quote: | Isn't "ignorant slut" a joke expression now
|
"Don't forget that `limpet' rhymes
With `strumpet' in these troubled times"
- Dylan Thomas
--
Regards,
Gareth Williams |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John Wiser
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 10:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Comm wrote:
| Quote: | "Geoff" <grw888@hotmail.com> wrote
Comm wrote:
Peter T. Daniels denies that he libeled someone with the abusive
term
"slut." When caught, he tried to pass it off as a joke. There was
clear
hostility in his statements. Not jokes.
SAMPLE ONE
[snip]
Lighten up. Peter was parodying a "Saturday Night Live" parody
[snip]
I never watched that show. I know he's just being a BITCH. But look at
the
size of the thread thus far - and it's only the first day. ROTFLMAO.
Damn,
that was easy. Like white on snow, they jumped at the opportunity to
bitch. |
--
Why don't you all go play in alt.traffic?
--
John Wiser
ceeclef@frontiernet.not |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Geoff
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 10:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Peter T. Daniels and LIBEL |
|
|
Steven Bornfeld wrote:
| Quote: |
Matthew Fields wrote:
Do you deny that you're an ignorant slut?
Maybe a legal question, but can a matter of opinion be libel? And can
it be libel if the target is anonymous?
Cheeeburrrgerrr cheeeburrrrgerrrr cheeburrgerrr
Steve
|
No coke - Petsi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
FAQ
Memberlist
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in