BBC America
Vocaboly.com Forum Index Vocaboly.com
Vocabulary builder software for SAT, TOEFL, GRE, GMAT and more
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web www.vocaboly.com
BBC America
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vocaboly.com Forum Index -> alt.usage.english
Author Message
the Omrud
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 12:03 am    Post subject: Re: BBC America Reply with quote

Linz typed thus:

Quote:

"the Omrud" <usenet.omrud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bfff87b239c699498aa04@news.individual.net...

We've had that in the UK for a decade - it's called Programme
Delivery Control. A signal is added to the teletext lines which
indicates at what time the programme was scheduled to start, and
the VCR looks for that rather than starting at the time
programmed. It records until it gets another signal indicating
that the programme has finished. Works perfectly.

ITYM works perfectly when the signals are sent correctly. I gave up with
PDC when I kept getting 1 minute of Babylon5, or the first half of a
motorsports programme or nothing at all despite 2 of us checking the
numbers as we programmed the VCR.

I've heard other people relate similar experiences, but ours always
worked perfectly. I can only think that some regions have it set up
better than others.

--
David
=====
replace the first component of address
with the definite article.

Back to top
Tony Cooper
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 12:03 am    Post subject: Re: BBC America Reply with quote

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:32:14 -0800, Charles Riggs
<chriggs@comcást.net> wrote:

Quote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:16:47 -0000, "Linz"
spam@nospam.lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote:


"don groves" <dgroves@domain.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bfffe72aff73c0d989b1d@news.individual.net...
In article <2vn20hF2n11lnU1@uni-berlin.de>, Maria Conlon at
mariaconlon001@hotmail.com exposited:
Tony Cooper wrote:

Oh, well. I don't have any interest in keeping a movie around
once I've watched it.

Same here, usually. (Not that I see or watch many movies these
days. See below.) Brian (my husband) can watch a movie
repeatedly. He even watches bits and pieces of movies. I can't
understand that at all. Rereading books, is, of course,
different. :-)

Maybe it's a guy thing. I've got a few favorties I can watch once
or twice a year and never tire of them. Some due to great acting,
others to great humor.

It's not just a guy thing. Or maybe I'm a guy in disguise.

It is a question not of sex but of whether one is a higher-order
individual or a philistine. Brutes watch great films only once, tiring
of them quickly due to their lack of imagination and refinement.
Brutes approach all works of art, books included, in that same way.

True brutes are, thankfully, relatively rare.

That's certainly one way of looking at it. The other might be the
"been there, done that" view of the brutes that are able to get it in
one.

I must admit that the one film genre that I can watch several times
with the same interest is the old Looney Tunes and Merry Melodies
cartoon. It seems that even though I know the plot, the action
sustains. I am looking forward to looking backward with my grandson
if I can find these still being shown.
Back to top
Matti Lamprhey
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:02 am    Post subject: Re: BBC America Reply with quote

"the Omrud" <usenet.omrud@gmail.com> wrote...
Quote:
Linz typed thus:
"the Omrud" <usenet.omrud@gmail.com> wrote...

We've had that in the UK for a decade - it's called Programme
Delivery Control. A signal is added to the teletext lines which
indicates at what time the programme was scheduled to start, and
the VCR looks for that rather than starting at the time
programmed. It records until it gets another signal indicating
that the programme has finished. Works perfectly.

ITYM works perfectly when the signals are sent correctly. I gave up
with PDC when I kept getting 1 minute of Babylon5, or the first half
of a motorsports programme or nothing at all despite 2 of us
checking the numbers as we programmed the VCR.

I've heard other people relate similar experiences, but ours always
worked perfectly. I can only think that some regions have it set up
better than others.

I think it depends on how it's implemented in the VCR. PDC was
pioneered in the UK by Channel 4, but with only lip service to the
official specification; "stop" codes weren't implemented, so the system
relied on VCRs stopping when the code changed or ceased for a certain
period. VCRs were designed around this eccentric implementation. Then
the BBC started to use PDC, but did it more correctly; you know the
rest.

Matti

Back to top
Jess Askin
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:04 am    Post subject: Re: BBC America Reply with quote

"Tony Cooper" <tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:vlpsp09vnfdkipshp8l9iia1nvfpn240ct@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:32:14 -0800, Charles Riggs
chriggs@comcást.net> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:16:47 -0000, "Linz"
spam@nospam.lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote:


"don groves" <dgroves@domain.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bfffe72aff73c0d989b1d@news.individual.net...
In article <2vn20hF2n11lnU1@uni-berlin.de>, Maria Conlon at
mariaconlon001@hotmail.com exposited:
Tony Cooper wrote:

Oh, well. I don't have any interest in keeping a movie around
once I've watched it.

Same here, usually. (Not that I see or watch many movies these
days. See below.) Brian (my husband) can watch a movie
repeatedly. He even watches bits and pieces of movies. I can't
understand that at all. Rereading books, is, of course,
different. :-)

Maybe it's a guy thing. I've got a few favorties I can watch once
or twice a year and never tire of them. Some due to great acting,
others to great humor.

It's not just a guy thing. Or maybe I'm a guy in disguise.

It is a question not of sex but of whether one is a higher-order
individual or a philistine. Brutes watch great films only once, tiring
of them quickly due to their lack of imagination and refinement.
Brutes approach all works of art, books included, in that same way.

True brutes are, thankfully, relatively rare.

That's certainly one way of looking at it. The other might be the
"been there, done that" view of the brutes that are able to get it in
one.

I must admit that the one film genre that I can watch several times
with the same interest is the old Looney Tunes and Merry Melodies
cartoon. It seems that even though I know the plot, the action
sustains. I am looking forward to looking backward with my grandson
if I can find these still being shown.

Cartoon Network.
Back to top
R H Draney
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:05 am    Post subject: Re: BBC America Reply with quote

Jess Askin filted:
Quote:

"Tony Cooper" <tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:vlpsp09vnfdkipshp8l9iia1nvfpn240ct@4ax.com...

I must admit that the one film genre that I can watch several times
with the same interest is the old Looney Tunes and Merry Melodies
cartoon. It seems that even though I know the plot, the action
sustains. I am looking forward to looking backward with my grandson
if I can find these still being shown.

Cartoon Network.

Also two sets of four DVDs each called the "Looney Tunes Golden
Collection"...when you tire of simply watching "What's Opera, Doc?", you can
select one of the alternate audio tracks and hear a discussion of the thought
processes that went into the coloring of the background, or of the mishmash of
Wagner pieces stitched together to create the score, or of how Chuck Jones
managed to get it done by stealing time from easy-to-make Road Runner cartoons
(the Warner Brothers' accountants had the impression that every cartoon takes
exactly five weeks to make, no more, no less)....

Skip the "Prestige Collection", by the way...it's a scaled-down version of the
same package....

I'm still trying to find a DVD source for the earlier black-and-white Merrie
Melodies from the pre-Porky era....r
Back to top
Jim Ward
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:06 am    Post subject: Re: crud, crap [WAS: BBC America] Reply with quote

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:43:55 +0100, trio@euronet.nl (Donna Richoux)
wrote:

Quote:
Although they may be used interchangeably by some, "crap" has the basic
meaning of "feces," while "crud" is merely something undesirable, like
sediment or rubbish. M-W says it is cognate with "curd," which I didn't
know, and it comes from Old English crudan, "to press." I can see "crud"
being the stuff left over after you press out the juice.

Speaking of "crap" one of a characters in a book I'm reading
interjects "Podverdomme!" Do you know what it means?
Back to top
Mark Brader
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:06 am    Post subject: Re: crud, crap [WAS: BBC America] Reply with quote

Jim Ward writes:
Quote:
Speaking of "crap" one of a characters in a book I'm reading
interjects "Podverdomme!" Do you know what it means?

So, Jim, was this question addressed to Donna because you knew it
was Dutch?

Looks like "verdomme" is a cognate of German "verdammt" and means
something like "damned", but the pod- part isn't covered by the
online translation tools I tried...
--
Mark Brader, Toronto "Unjutsly malinged? I think not."
msb@vex.net -- Ross Howard
Back to top
Frances Kemmish
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:06 am    Post subject: Re: crud, crap [WAS: BBC America] Reply with quote

Mark Brader wrote:

Quote:
Jim Ward writes:

Speaking of "crap" one of a characters in a book I'm reading
interjects "Podverdomme!" Do you know what it means?


So, Jim, was this question addressed to Donna because you knew it
was Dutch?

Looks like "verdomme" is a cognate of German "verdammt" and means
something like "damned", but the pod- part isn't covered by the
online translation tools I tried...

I assumed it was a typo for "God verdamme" (I've probably spelt that
wrong). I remember my mother telling me in no uncertain terms that I was
never to say that in the hearing of my Dutch relatives.

Fran
Back to top
Mark Brader
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:06 am    Post subject: Re: crud, crap [WAS: BBC America] Reply with quote

Jim Ward:
Quote:
Speaking of "crap" one of a characters in a book I'm reading
interjects "Podverdomme!" Do you know what it means?

Mark Brader:
Quote:
Looks like "verdomme" is a cognate of German "verdammt" and means
something like "damned", but the pod- part isn't covered by the
online translation tools I tried...

Frances Kemmish:
Quote:
I assumed it was a typo for "God verdamme" (I've probably spelt that
wrong). ...

Goddammit Smile, I should've thought of that. Google even *asked* if I
meant "godverdomme". But there were 20 hits on the other spelling,
which seemed reasonable if it was a sufficiently obscure word in a
language with relatively few speakers. And I also assumed Jim meant
that the character *habitually* said that. Was it just once?

I do note that G is nowhere near P on any keyboard I can think of --
not qwerty, not azerty, not Dvorak, not Linotype (etaoin shrdlu). So
if it *is* a typo, it's interesting that there are as many as 20 hits.
Compare:

godverdomme 45,800
podverdomme 20

goddamn 1,360,000
goddamnit 108,000
goddammit 139,000
poddamn 1
poddamnit 0
poddammit 0

(I also tried goddam/poddam, but the latter turns out to be a word
in Polish.)

Could it be a pun, or a euphemism in the style of "heck" for "hell"?
--
Mark Brader "I love talking about nothing.
Toronto It's the only thing I know anything about."
msb@vex.net --Lord Goring (Oscar Wilde: An Ideal Husband)

My text in this article is in the public domain.
Back to top
Jim Ward
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:06 am    Post subject: Re: crud, crap [WAS: BBC America] Reply with quote

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 03:21:14 -0000, msb@vex.net (Mark Brader) wrote:

Quote:
Jim Ward:
Speaking of "crap" one of a characters in a book I'm reading
interjects "Podverdomme!" Do you know what it means?

Mark Brader:
Looks like "verdomme" is a cognate of German "verdammt" and means
something like "damned", but the pod- part isn't covered by the
online translation tools I tried...

Frances Kemmish:
I assumed it was a typo for "God verdamme" (I've probably spelt that
wrong). ...

Goddammit Smile, I should've thought of that. Google even *asked* if I
meant "godverdomme". But there were 20 hits on the other spelling,
which seemed reasonable if it was a sufficiently obscure word in a
language with relatively few speakers. And I also assumed Jim meant
that the character *habitually* said that. Was it just once?

I just checked, definitely "Podver". The character grew up in Holland,
moved to America as a child, but always curses in Dutch when suddenly
suprised (the influence of his uncles).

When I'm suprised, I blurt "Holy Shit!" (nothing special about that).
Back to top
Donna Richoux
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 12:01 pm    Post subject: Re: crud, crap [WAS: BBC America] Reply with quote

Jim Ward <tomcatpolka@NyOaShPoAoM.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 03:21:14 -0000, msb@vex.net (Mark Brader) wrote:

Jim Ward:
Speaking of "crap" one of a characters in a book I'm reading
interjects "Podverdomme!" Do you know what it means?

Mark Brader:
Looks like "verdomme" is a cognate of German "verdammt" and means
something like "damned", but the pod- part isn't covered by the
online translation tools I tried...

Frances Kemmish:
I assumed it was a typo for "God verdamme" (I've probably spelt that
wrong). ...

Goddammit Smile, I should've thought of that. Google even *asked* if I
meant "godverdomme". But there were 20 hits on the other spelling,
which seemed reasonable if it was a sufficiently obscure word in a
language with relatively few speakers. And I also assumed Jim meant
that the character *habitually* said that. Was it just once?

I just checked, definitely "Podver". The character grew up in Holland,
moved to America as a child, but always curses in Dutch when suddenly
suprised (the influence of his uncles).

My knowledge of Dutch swear words --> head of pin. But my Dutch-English
dic says poddam = dash it. So, euphemistic alteration.

--
Best - Donna Richoux
Back to top
Charles Riggs
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:01 pm    Post subject: Re: BBC America Reply with quote

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:41:42 GMT, Tony Cooper
<tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> wrote:

Quote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:32:14 -0800, Charles Riggs
chriggs@comcást.net> wrote:

It is a question not of sex but of whether one is a higher-order
individual or a philistine. Brutes watch great films only once, tiring
of them quickly due to their lack of imagination and refinement.
Brutes approach all works of art, books included, in that same way.

True brutes are, thankfully, relatively rare.

That's certainly one way of looking at it. The other might be the
"been there, done that" view of the brutes that are able to get it in
one.

If you can appreciate all the nuances of a fine painting, a great
book, or a masterful film in one go, have at it. Even if you could
though, I'd wonder why you'd want to. There are only so many great
works of art in the world to contemplate.
--
Charles Riggs

They are no accented letters in my email address
Back to top
the Omrud
Guest





Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 12:00 am    Post subject: Re: crud, crap [WAS: BBC America] Reply with quote

Ray Heindl typed thus:

Quote:
Jim Ward <tomcatpolka@NyOaShPoAoM.com> wrote:

Elsewhere in the book:

"In Holland, typically, one can expect the wind to strengthen the
moment you get on a bicycle and to turn as you do, so that no
matter which direction you bike you will always be biking into a
gale-force headwind."

I guess the wind takes the place of the hills that burden cyclists
elsewhere.

(Is Holland really very flat, or is that just a stereotype?)

Very flat. Yes. Highest point is about 300 metres above sea level.

--
David
=====
replace the first component of address
with the definite article.
Back to top
Mike Lyle
Guest





Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 12:00 am    Post subject: Re: crud, crap [WAS: BBC America] Reply with quote

the Omrud wrote:
Quote:
Ray Heindl typed thus:

Jim Ward <tomcatpolka@NyOaShPoAoM.com> wrote:

Elsewhere in the book:

"In Holland, typically, one can expect the wind to strengthen the
moment you get on a bicycle and to turn as you do, so that no
matter which direction you bike you will always be biking into a
gale-force headwind."

I guess the wind takes the place of the hills that burden cyclists
elsewhere.

(Is Holland really very flat, or is that just a stereotype?)

Very flat. Yes. Highest point is about 300 metres above sea
level.


Very flat, Holland.

Mike.
Back to top
Areff
Guest





Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 12:00 am    Post subject: Re: crud, crap [WAS: BBC America] Reply with quote

Ray Heindl wrote:
Quote:
(Is Holland really very flat,

Yes. That's why the Dutch so liked what is now Brooklyn (FLCIA), as well
as Michigan.

--
Steny '08!
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vocaboly.com Forum Index -> alt.usage.english All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 8 of 9

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Office Forum Access Forum Electronics Windows Server Exchange Server
New Topics Powered by phpBB