| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Advise on online MBA program |
|
|
I am an Admissions Advisor the University of Liverpool's online Masters
degree programme, so I would say I probably cannot give you an
absolutely unbiased opinion, HOWEVER, I also have had personal
experience with another rather well know online study programme from
the USA as I live and work Internationally. I am proud to say that
since I started here I have really gained a lot of understanding about
online education and appreciate the research needed to determine the
right school and programme.
I do know for a fact that many companies are now paying more attention
to where a persons degree is from. Its easy for your CV to say you have
a degree, but having spoken directly to several decision makers, in an
employers market, it is in your best interest to look at the University
directly. Really consider the academic institution first. If it is a
great University, you should be able to expect that the online study
will also be of quality. The syllabi, grading, instructors,
dissertation expectations etc, should all be the same for the online
programme as it is for the on campus programme.
In speaking with many potential students, I hear the concern quite
often about the quality of online. How can it be as good as on campus?
I know that the online programme with the UoL has guidelines to ensure
that each student does receive the same high quality education. For
some people it is better to be in an International virtual classroom of
12 -15 students where you receive very close and personal attention
than to be in an on campus class of 50- 60 students or more. Again, I
work as an Admissions Advisor for the University of Liverpool, so do
not just take my or anyone's word for it, DO as much research as you
can before your decision.
For the UoL, check out the Virtual Tour so that you can see how it all
works. It becomes obvious that with the 20 average hours of work per
week it takes to complete the degree, logging in to your class room
about 4 times a week, really does provide a solid education. You will
do a lot of reading and group assignments and you will receive a
quality education. Certainly an academic institution that is over 100
years old, part of the UK's Russell Group, has 8 Nobel Prize Laureates
and has been classified as one of the TOP 10 in the UK is NOT going to
start an online study programme and not deliver. That would ruin their
reputation.
Virtual Tour http://www.uol.ohecampus.com/elearning/vtour.phtml
Facts and Figures http://www.liv.ac.uk/about/facts_and_figs/
I can tell you that as an Advisor I am more concerned with a potential
students motivation and preparedness to pursue a Masters degree. It
takes a great commitment that is based on having truly considered your
current situation.
Why do you want a Masters? Do you NEED an Masters? Have you considered
the time it will add to your work week? Have you researched the
descriptions for the classes, do they really provide what your future
plans require? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Help! (Umass Vs Purdue) |
|
|
| How about Wisconsin Madison ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Navin Kumar
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 3:36 am
Post subject: Re: Help! (Umass Vs Purdue) |
|
|
U Wisconsin at Madison is a decent school, well respected in the
midwest & west coast; new englanders tend to rank it below purdue. The
school you want to go to really depends on which part of the country
you want to work in - just as japanese rank Tokyo U far above MIT and
the usa ranks MIT far above Tokyo U, it's all a matter of locality.
Pick a _good_ school (top-20 in the nation) which is in the vicinity of
where you want to work. In terms of national recognition, among your
three schools, Purdue is best ranked, closely followed by Wisconsin
Madison, and there's a large gap between those two and UMass Amherst
(Umass Amherst may be top-50 but not top-20) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RJ
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Testing |
|
|
In article <MPG.1cf971253c6adb0a9896da@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org> wrote:
| Quote: | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Glory ye on this holy date Sat, 21 May 2005 06:16:42 -0700
It came to pass when RJ <localfivehundred@yaah0o.com
Hast spoken it in <61du8110u0t1o2pnsilr6784h5qpqopcv6@4ax.com
And thee said unto news:alt.2600.warez
[
[In article <MPG.1cf7f0b9e2f21ac79896d3@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com
[TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org> wrote:
[
[>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[>Hash: SHA1
[
[>Glory ye on this holy date 20 May 2005 05:50:32 -0700
[>It came to pass when <junkmailbuster@gmail.com
[>Hast spoken it in <1116593432.259025.9580@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
[>And thee said unto news:alt.2600.warez
[>[
[>[Testing, please ignore
[
[>You're testing all those groups - not one has the word *test* in it.
[
[>news:alt.test is that a way! -------
[
[
[What a hypocrite!
First of all you don't understand what a hypocrite is,
|
Said someone who posts "english" and "contridiction" and cannot
comprehend simple English.
| Quote: | if you did you
would not be (a) flaming (b) acting like the authority (c) spell laming
|
Like you are doing?
Let take a look.
You are:
a. Flaming while telling others not to flame.
b. Acting like an authority, telling people not to post requests, test
messages, or anything that you don't like or think that should not be
posted.
c. Flaming for spelling while screwing up in the process, and I can post
messages that you did that in, if you deny it.
What does the above make, going by your own theory?
A hypocrite, that is right.
| Quote: | which demonstrates you _do not_ understand the word.
|
I don't "understand" the word as you see it.
I understand the word as it is defined in the good old English language.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hypocrite
4 entries found for hypocrite.
hyp·o·crite ( P ) Pronunciation Key (hp-krt)
n.
A person given to hypocrisy.
[Middle English ipocrite, from Old French, from Late Latin hypocrita,
from Greek hupocrits, actor, from hupokrnesthai, to play a part,
pretend. See hypocrisy.]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language,
Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
hypocrite
n : a person who professes beliefs and opinions that he does not hold
[syn: dissembler, phony, phoney, pretender]
Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University
Read your own posts and see how the word hypocrite EXACTLY is the
correct word to describe you.
You tell others not to post serial numbers, while you have done in
several times, you tell others not to post binaries in non binary
newsgroups, while you were caught posting binaries in non binary
newsgroups like this one, you tell people not to flame and whine about
it, while your posts are nothing but flames and flame baits, and in fact
the common denominator in all the flame fests here is you.
You tell people not to flame for spelling but you conveniently do that
yourself.
You tell people that they shouldn't tell others what to do, but your
posts tell them how to post, how to ask for software, when, where and
why.
You whine like the bitch that you are claiming conspiracy and accuse
almost everyone of socking, while you got caught socking so many times
that it became obvious that you will sock whenever you are cornered,
which means everytime.
Therefore don't whine when you are called a hypocrite.
| Quote: | [From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org
[Message-ID: <MPG.1cf6e270cad277389896ce@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com
[
["The guy is correcting the first person acting like he is the authority"
[
[
[You whine when others post something, thinking that they are saying that
[they have some authority while you are the one who is acting like you
[have some authority to tell people what to post, proving that you are a
[fucked in the head douche bag.
No John.. _you_ whined when other post things,
not I.
|
Look at this thread for a close example, you retarded fuckhead,
You whined when someone posted a test message.
From: junkmailbuster@gmail.com
Testing, please ignore
Date: 20 May 2005 05:50:32 -0700
Message-ID: <1116593432.259025.9580@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Testing, please ignore
You responded, whining like the bitch that you are.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Subject: Re: Testing
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 14:04:26 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1cf7f0b9e2f21ac79896d3@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
You're testing all those groups - not one has the word *test* in it.
news:alt.test is that a way! ------->
Good luck denying that you posted that.
| Quote: | The person _corrected_
him on a subject which he thought he was an authority on, and I showed him
and you, and LSD, to be idiots on it.
|
Different thread, shit stain,
And you were schooled on the basics of usenet, email, SMTP, NNTP, and
reading comprehension, but it was lost on you, and you bailed out of
that thread claiming that you have kill filed LSD since you were
outgunned and outclassed, as usual.
| Quote: | It doesn't take a genuis, unless it is in your case, to figure out that you
make *test* posts in a test group. It doesn't take an authority on that
subject to point it out either.
|
Yeah, but let's use the flawed thinking of a retard who said that this
is an alt newsgroup (or group as you refer to newsgroups) and therefore
there are no rules.
That makes you look more stupid trying to enforce a rule that doesn't
exist, following your own flawed thinking, doesn't it?
So either rules exist or they don't, which is it, Leslie?
You can't have it both ways.
If as you say that rules do not exist in alt newsgroups, then you cannot
flame people for posting anything in alt newsgroups.
If rules exist, then most of your posts do not adhere to the rules and
therefore you need to shut the fuck up, since no one appointed you as
the keeper of the rules.
| Quote: | Just like it doesn't take an authority in mental disorders
|
There is something like that?
"an authority in mental disorders"?
So mental disorders are laws, or something that you can control or rule,
therefore an authority exists in them or about them?
ROLFMAO!!!!
Damn those online translators, really making you look like the idiot you
are.
At least try translating the flames that you plagiarize properly.
| Quote: | to see you are a disturbed person.
|
I am disturbed by seeing the incredible show of hypocrisy, low IQ,
stupid words and uncommon phrases, the lack of education, the kookyness,
and psychopathic behavior in your posts, who wouldn't be?
I am also disturbed by the fact that you are freely roaming the streets
and reading and posting on usenet instead of being where you belong, in
psychiatric care, who wouldn't be?
You are a psychopath, a stupid psychopath, and stalking others is your
goal in life, and since you don't have a life outside usenet, you are
locked for ever in being someone that everyone on usenet will piss on at
will, and own your ass for being a psychopathic retarded bitch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stan de SD
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:14 pm
Post subject: Re: <> Doing your assignments INSTEAD of YOU <> |
|
|
You still flogging your rent-a-cheat scam, Fairman? When you going to get a
real job?
"Your Partner N1" <partner5498@excite.com> wrote in message
news:be3c67d7.0411161010.761da992@posting.google.com...
| Quote: | Dear Students,
I am a scientist, providing advanced help for undergrad,
postgrad, distance education and adult students in doing assignments,
theses, projects, dissertations, etc.
Subjects available:
-mathematics
-physics
-electrical engineering
-computer science
-communications
-systems analysis
-business & management
-international business
-HR & PR management
-other (inquire your specific subject)
Please visit my web site:
http://www.megaone.com/expert2003/consultant.htm
for more info.
You may submit your assignment text online
by filling in a feedback form.
Note: contact me *only* from my web site.
Don't reply to this article's email address.
Scientist
(please visit my website to find out my real name) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drew
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 1:52 am
Post subject: Re: Honours systems |
|
|
Hi Michael:
If you are talking about graduate school, most US colleges do not
designate cum laude, magna cum laude, or suma cum laude students.
These are used only for undergraduate students. I didn't look any
statistics up to bear me out. But I would say that in the average
graduating undergrad college class in the US, far less thatn 10 to 15%
graduate suma cum laude. You might be able to find more with Google.
Drew
On 17 Jun 2005 22:01:39 -0700, dayzman@hotmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | Hi,
I'm from Australia and have a question about the honours systems in
Australia and US. It appears that First Class Honours in Australia
should be equivalent to Summa cum laude in US. In my degree, we usually
have around 10-15% of graduants receiving first class honours. So, is
the honour system used in Australia equivalent to the one used in US?
Cheers,
Michael |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 4:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Honours systems |
|
|
Drew,
I believe Michael was referring to the "honours system" used in the
UK and other Commonwealth countries (e.g. Australia) that differs
somewhat from the Latin honors system used by some schools in the US.
Basically, in the UK for example, a course of studies leading to an
undergraduate degree like BSc, BA, BEng or MEng, is divided into
"Parts", each of which may correspond to one or two school years.
Student get a certain number of points for each "part", based mostly on
their grades in comprehensive final exams called "papers" (generally 9
or so per year) and, to a lesser extent, on classwork, lab reports and
projects. Depending then on the ratio between the number of points
assigned to a particular student and the maximum number of points that
can be achieved in his/her course, the student graduates with honours
(respectively at the "first class", "upper second class", "lower second
class", or "third class" levels), receives a simple "pass" (without
honours), or fails to obtain the degree.
Just as an example, the following link
http://www2.ee.ic.ac.uk/electricalengineering/teaching/GH56HonoursScheme.pdf
explains the assessment criteria for the MEng (4-year undergraduate
degree) in Information Systems Engineering (ISE) at the Imperial
College London. For other Electrical Engineering (EE) degrees, see
http://www2.ee.ic.ac.uk/electricalengineering/teaching/EEEAssessment0405Final.pdf
For a complete of list of classes, including third and fourth-year
electives that can be taken for both ISE and MSE degrees, go to
http://www2.ee.ic.ac.uk/electricalengineering/courses/crslistug.asp?c=NIL
Drew wrote:
| Quote: | Hi Michael:
If you are talking about graduate school, most US colleges do not
designate cum laude, magna cum laude, or suma cum laude students.
These are used only for undergraduate students. I didn't look any
statistics up to bear me out. But I would say that in the average
graduating undergrad college class in the US, far less thatn 10 to 15%
graduate suma cum laude. You might be able to find more with Google.
Drew
On 17 Jun 2005 22:01:39 -0700, dayzman@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm from Australia and have a question about the honours systems in
Australia and US. It appears that First Class Honours in Australia
should be equivalent to Summa cum laude in US. In my degree, we usually
have around 10-15% of graduants receiving first class honours. So, is
the honour system used in Australia equivalent to the one used in US?
Cheers,
Michael |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |