black
Vocaboly.com Forum Index Vocaboly.com
Vocabulary builder software for SAT, TOEFL, GRE, GMAT and more
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web www.vocaboly.com
black
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vocaboly.com Forum Index -> alt.english.usage
Author Message
Peter
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:14 am    Post subject: black Reply with quote

Hi,

I have just had a discussion with my wife today about the term "negro".

I am a native English speaker, originally from New Zealand, but have lived
in Denmark for the last 10 years. While I was speaking English today my
Danish wife admonished me for using the word "negro" - saying that it was an
offensive term.

I vehemently disagreed, feeling safe in my superiority in English... but it
turns out she may be right. When did this happen? I am sure that 10 years
ago when I left NZ negro was a perfectly acceptable, non-offensive,
description of a "black person" (probably more correctly of a racial group
of people, I guess), but not any more. What does one say then?

Incidently, the word cropped up when we were discussing the Danish word
"mulat", which according to my Danish-English dictionary translates to
"mulatto". Apparently, however, "mulat" is not offensive in Danish, whereas
I have always understood "mulatto" to be so - isn't it? Is my dictionary
wrong on this count? (Or am I wrong, again?)

Thanks,
Peter

Back to top
Tony Cooper
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:45 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

There's really no way to identify an offensive term since different
people take offense at different things. However, I wouldn't consider
"negro" to be offensive. Out-dated, perhaps, but not offensive.

However, I'm white. Something that I don't consider to be offensive
might be offensive to someone in the group being referred to. Use of
"negro" may or may not offend, but it does conjure up images of
baseball games when male spectators wore fedoras and ties and other
images of times-gone-by.

We - in the US - use "African American" in most cases. That's used
even if the person hasn't had roots in Africa since the Year Dot.
Obviously, that's not going to work in Denmark or New Zealand. To
find out what is currently polite and acceptable, you're going to have
to find a black person and ask them. Of course, if you ask a black
person what he prefers to be called, you have to expect them to say
"Joe" or whatever his name is.
Back to top
joetaxpayer@nospam.com
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:58 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

I've been pondering this as well (I live just outside of Boston, MA). In
the late 70's a Baptist minister moved to my street and his daughter
asked me if any ni**ers lived in the area. So here is a word that so
taboo to me, I'd not even post it in a forum anonamously. I set her
straight that the word was unacceptable, and she said that where she was
from, it was not perjorative, but a common word.

In that same timeframe, my parents said 'Negro' although 'Black' was
what we (the teenagers) used as the respectful word to offer no offense.
My dying grandmother had a nurse comming to visit weekly and called her
'the colored girl'. I suppose to a 90 year old, a 40 year old,
registered nurse, doctor, etc. is still a girl, but I thought the
expression lacked respect.

Since that time, AfroAmerican, African American, Black, and People of
Color have all been used. I've thought the African thing was a
mis-nomer, as there are dark skinned people who don't trace there
lineage to the African immigration the early white Americans forced on
Africans. I think if anything, Negro has become passe, but not
offensive. I'd like to hear what others think of this, I suspect a large
regional bias toward a given word and little if any, concensus within
the US, let alone the world.

I do view it as positive that people are at least looking for the right
words, that's the first step, isn't it?

JOE

Back to top
Harvey Van Sickle
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:24 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

On 24 Sep 2004, Peter wrote
Quote:
Hi,

I have just had a discussion with my wife today about the term
"negro".

I am a native English speaker, originally from New Zealand, but
have lived in Denmark for the last 10 years. While I was speaking
English today my Danish wife admonished me for using the word
"negro" - saying that it was an offensive term.

I vehemently disagreed, feeling safe in my superiority in
English... but it turns out she may be right. When did this
happen? I am sure that 10 years ago when I left NZ negro was a
perfectly acceptable, non-offensive, description of a "black
person" (probably more correctly of a racial group of people, I
guess), but not any more. What does one say then?

"Negro" had pretty well disappeared from polite NAmer usage before I
moved to England (1982); "black" was the substitute then, but as
Tony's explained, it's changed since then and is probably changing
again as we speak/type.

As you'd agree (probably? could be wrong), NZ tends to be conservative
in such matters. (All of my in-laws are from there; most still live
there; North Island.) It wouldn't surprise me if "negro" remained in
common use for some years -- or even decades -- after it was abandoned
in NAmer, but I'd be a bit surprised if it's still used there in any
sort of progressive circle.

Quote:
Incidently, the word cropped up when we were discussing the Danish
word "mulat", which according to my Danish-English dictionary
translates to "mulatto". Apparently, however, "mulat" is not
offensive in Danish, whereas I have always understood "mulatto" to
be so - isn't it? Is my dictionary wrong on this count? (Or am I
wrong, again?)

Depends on context for me, but personally I don't think I've ever used
"mulatto" in casual conversation.

--
Cheers, Harvey

Ottawa/Toronto/Edmonton for 30 years;
Southern England for the past 22 years.
(for e-mail, change harvey.news to harvey.van)
Back to top
Gary Eickmeier
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:29 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

joetaxpayer@nospam.com wrote:
I think if anything, Negro has become passe, but not
Quote:
offensive. I'd like to hear what others think of this, I suspect a large
regional bias toward a given word and little if any, concensus within
the US, let alone the world.

United Negro College Fund

Negro League baseball

Negro spirituals

Gary Eickmeier
Back to top
Harvey Van Sickle
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:53 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

On 24 Sep 2004, Gary Eickmeier wrote
Quote:
joetaxpayer@nospam.com wrote:

I think if anything, Negro has become passe, but not
offensive. I'd like to hear what others think of this, I suspect
a large regional bias toward a given word and little if any,
concensus within the US, let alone the world.

"Consensus"; one "c". Ve haf our schtandards, y'know...

Quote:
United Negro College Fund
Negro League baseball
Negro spirituals

That's special pleading: those are historic survivals -- a newly-
established body wouldn't use the term.

(NAACP. Are you saying that this makes "Colored People" a term that
can be used in any other context with nary an eyelid batted?)


--
Cheers, Harvey

Ottawa/Toronto/Edmonton for 30 years;
Southern England for the past 22 years.
(for e-mail, change harvey.news to harvey.van)
Back to top
don groves
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:39 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

In article <41547232$1@news.wineasy.se>, peter@ciber wrote...
Quote:
Hi,

I have just had a discussion with my wife today about the term "negro".

I am a native English speaker, originally from New Zealand, but have lived
in Denmark for the last 10 years. While I was speaking English today my
Danish wife admonished me for using the word "negro" - saying that it was an
offensive term.

It's not offensive itself so much as it is for being the term
that led to "nigger" and "nigra", offensive terms that originated
in the Amercian South.

I use black, along with many others, because the black community
has told us that's the term they prefer. Those who are proud of
their heritage prefer to be called black.

"People of Color" refers to all non-whites in the US.
--
dg (domain=ccwebster)
Back to top
Bill McCray
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:14 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:58:47 GMT, "joetaxpayer@nospam.com"
<joetaxpayer@nospam.com> wrote:

Quote:


I've been pondering this as well (I live just outside of Boston, MA). In
the late 70's a Baptist minister moved to my street and his daughter
asked me if any ni**ers lived in the area. So here is a word that so
taboo to me, I'd not even post it in a forum anonamously. I set her
straight that the word was unacceptable, and she said that where she was
from, it was not perjorative, but a common word.
In that same timeframe, my parents said 'Negro' although 'Black' was
what we (the teenagers) used as the respectful word to offer no offense.
My dying grandmother had a nurse comming to visit weekly and called her
'the colored girl'. I suppose to a 90 year old, a 40 year old,
registered nurse, doctor, etc. is still a girl, but I thought the
expression lacked respect.
Since that time, AfroAmerican, African American, Black, and People of
Color have all been used. I've thought the African thing was a
mis-nomer, as there are dark skinned people who don't trace there
lineage to the African immigration the early white Americans forced on
Africans. I think if anything, Negro has become passe, but not
offensive. I'd like to hear what others think of this, I suspect a large
regional bias toward a given word and little if any, concensus within
the US, let alone the world.
I do view it as positive that people are at least looking for the right
words, that's the first step, isn't it?
JOE

As I was growing up, we were taught to say "Colored". It was
definitely not intended to be offensive. I was out of college before
the preferred term (not sure by whom) went through "Afroamerican"
quickly and settled upon "Black". It took me a while to get use to
the change, but I did. I haven't yet switched to "African American"
and maybe won't, mainly because it is just wrong in most cases (a
condition also shared by "black"). I certainly don't consider myself
to be a "European American".

Until recently I thought "Caucasian" and "Negro" were the proper terms
for these two groups, but just a few years ago I was informed that
"Negro" is considered offensive by some.

But thinking about it, it seems to me that for any group of humans
that are considered by some to be somehow inferior, any term that is
used for that group will eventually become offensive to some. I'm
part of the group called "old", "older", "elderly", "seniors", "senior
citizens", "golden-agers", "more mature", etc. and I never know what
term I should use to refer to us without offending someone. And then
there're those with disabilities. And those that are, uh, "slow". Or
even female. I have recently been in a debate over whether a phrase on
my mother's headstone should be "First female member of ..." or "First
woman member of ...". (We avoided the problem by saying "First woman
to be inducted into ...".)

So let's face it. Because of the perception of the group, any term
applied to the group will probably become offensive. Rather than
continually changing the terms for the groups, we need to change the
perception of the group. I wish I knew how to do that.

Signed: An older, intelligent, height-impaired, overabundantly wide,
smelling-impaired, follicle-deprived, Caucasian, programmar programmer

Swap first and last parts of username and ISP for address.
Back to top
Don Phillipson
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:01 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

Quote:
"People of Color" refers to all non-whites in the US.

Not quite, so far as native American Indians regard
themselves as both non-white and not People of
Color" (which just demonstrates the impossibility
of pleasing everyone. Remember Eskimo, an
Indian word for Arctic northerners, was a standard
ethnological term for a century but now has been
discarded because it was rumoured to be cognate
with barbarians.)

--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Back to top
don groves
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 9:15 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

In article <Ur35d.1061$Cb5.6717@newscontent-01.sprint.ca>,
d.phillipson@ttrryytteell.com wrote...
Quote:
"don groves" <dgroves@domain.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bbe41eaff05b69989731@news.individual.net...

"People of Color" refers to all non-whites in the US.

Not quite, so far as native American Indians regard
themselves as both non-white and not People of
Color" (which just demonstrates the impossibility
of pleasing everyone. Remember Eskimo, an
Indian word for Arctic northerners, was a standard
ethnological term for a century but now has been
discarded because it was rumoured to be cognate
with barbarians.)

I hadn't heard that reason before. I thought Eskimo was replaced
by the more anthropologically accurate terms Aleut and Inuit.
Similar to why we now call people of the Far East Asian, instead
of Oriental.
--
dg (domain=ccwebster)
Back to top
Christopher Green
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:28 am    Post subject: Re: Eskimo [was Re: black] Reply with quote

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:14:57 -0700, "H. E. Taylor"
<het@despam.autobahn.mb.ca> wrote:

Quote:
In article <Ur35d.1061$Cb5.6717@newscontent-01.sprint.ca>,
d.phillipson@ttrryytteell.com> Don Phillipson wrote:

[...] Remember Eskimo, an
Indian word for Arctic northerners, was a standard
ethnological term for a century but now has been
discarded because it was rumoured to be cognate
with barbarians.)


The story I heard was that 'Eskimo' was an insulting
Dene word that meant 'eater of blubber', but I don't
speak Dene or Innu for that matter.

Anybody got the real deal?

curious
-het

I'd long understood it to be equivalent to Algonquian "askimowew"
(roughly, "he who eats it raw") and at least somewhat derogatory.

--
Chris Green
Back to top
Raymond S. Wise
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:11 am    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

don groves wrote:
Quote:
In article <41547232$1@news.wineasy.se>, peter@ciber wrote...
Hi,

I have just had a discussion with my wife today about the term
"negro".

I am a native English speaker, originally from New Zealand, but have
lived in Denmark for the last 10 years. While I was speaking English
today my Danish wife admonished me for using the word "negro" -
saying that it was an offensive term.

It's not offensive itself so much as it is for being the term
that led to "nigger" and "nigra", offensive terms that originated
in the Amercian South.


The word "nigger" is not derived from "Negro." Those two words came into the
English language by different paths, "nigger" having come into English via
French.

I was surprised to see that the original poster did not capitalized "Negro."
In American English, at least, for many decades now it has not been
acceptable to leave it uncapitalized. I'm fifty years old, and I was taught
to write it as "Negro" when I was young.


Quote:

I use black, along with many others, because the black community
has told us that's the term they prefer. Those who are proud of
their heritage prefer to be called black.

"People of Color" refers to all non-whites in the US.


In my experience, that is almost always spelled uncapitalized: "people of
color."


--
Raymond S. Wise
Minneapolis, Minnesota USA

E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com
Back to top
Zephir Woodwood
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:06 pm    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

In Australia our Indigenous people often refer to themselves as
"blackfellas" and everyone else as "whitefellas".
It seems to be acceptable if you're Indigenous or if you are someone
Indigneous people have imputed some respect.
Back to top
H. E. Taylor
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:14 pm    Post subject: Eskimo [was Re: black] Reply with quote

In article <Ur35d.1061$Cb5.6717@newscontent-01.sprint.ca>,
<d.phillipson@ttrryytteell.com> Don Phillipson wrote:
Quote:

[...] Remember Eskimo, an
Indian word for Arctic northerners, was a standard
ethnological term for a century but now has been
discarded because it was rumoured to be cognate
with barbarians.)


The story I heard was that 'Eskimo' was an insulting
Dene word that meant 'eater of blubber', but I don't
speak Dene or Innu for that matter.

Anybody got the real deal?

<curious>
-het


--
"My center is giving way, my right is in retreat; situation excellent.
I shall attack." -French Marshal Ferdinand Foch, the Marne 1914

How's yer crap detector? http://www.autobahn.mb.ca/~het/detector.html
H.E. Taylor http://www.autobahn.mb.ca/~het/
Back to top
Michael DeBusk
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:01 pm    Post subject: Re: black Reply with quote

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:29:54 GMT, Gary Eickmeier
<geickmei@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

Quote:
United Negro College Fund

Negro League baseball

Negro spirituals

Gary Eickmeier

I'm sorry, I don't get how the last one fits.

--
Michael DeBusk, Co-Conspirator to Make the World a Better Place
Did he update http://home.earthlink.net/~debu4335/ yet?
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Vocaboly.com Forum Index -> alt.english.usage All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 1 of 8

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Office Forum Access Forum Electronics Windows Server Exchange Server
New Topics Powered by phpBB